Campus Review Volume 28 - Issue 5 | May 2018 | Page 17

industry & research campusreview.com.au really clever in their research area but have minimal or no training in supervision. Some of them don’t even believe in the need to be worried about the ‘person’ side of the business. They’re content to just get the data out and get more work done. And again, they will have an impact on students. Although not as extreme as toxic supervisors, they will have high demands and be very critical when giving feedback. They’re very busy, so they’re not around much, and they leave the student alone, but they get upset when things don’t happen. Again, I’m not blaming these supervisors; they haven’t had the support and training they need. The next issue that comes up all the time is the isolation. Research students often feel that no one else is interested in their work, and they don’t want to talk to the supervisors because that’s a bit scary. So they’re very much left on their own. In terms of mental health, if you’re concerned or worried being left all by yourself, the worries will multiply and become more extreme. Then, when students do seek help, maybe from the graduate school, they don’t get very clear answers or much support, and they feel nobody cares about their situation. In addition, they’re under a lot of pressure to finish within time, to publish papers, all these things. And they’re also wondering: “Will I get a job at the end of all this?” So, if a student experiences all these things – bad supervision, no support, feeling isolated, things going wrong with their research – that’s a good mix for developing mental health issues. Has this issue become more prevalent over time, or are we just more aware now? There’s a couple of things going on. Sometimes people will tell me: “This is the way it’s always been. There’s nothing we can do. These are our policies and procedures. We’ve done PhDs for decades and this is nothing different.” However, the argument I’m putting forward is that things are not the same, this is not always the way it was. In Australia, over the past 25 years, the number of PhD students, or beginning research students, has increased sixfold. The number of international students in Australia has tripled in about the last 10 years. Also, the types of people doing PhDs are very different now – they’re people who are working, large numbers of international students, people who have less academic backgrounds. We have many more students now, but the supervisor support hasn’t changed. They haven’t kept pace with that at all. The pressure to publish during a PhD wasn’t there 25 years ago; now you have to be publishing papers as well as doing a PhD. What’s happened in Australia in more recent times is the huge pressure to finish on time. We have to get people out in three years, and that wasn’t there before, and the reality is almost nobody does finish in three years, but there’s this huge pressure to do that. That’s why I’d argue the system has changed a lot, and that’s one part. As to the second part of your question, there’s no doubt we talk about it more now. There was no doubt that there were mental health issues before, but now, fortunately, it’s more acceptable to talk about that. It becomes more public, and so that’s part of the reason as well. What can students do to address this? The one important resource which I’m very supportive of is the Council of Australi an Postgraduate Associations (CAPA). Postgraduate associations are really important; they’re available across the country in terms of support and funding and things like that, but a good postgraduate association would be an advocate for the student, where someone could go and talk to them in a confidential, secure place and get advice. Many students are reluctant to complain through official channels because they’re worried they’ll be discriminated against, that it will come back to haunt them and be career-damaging. That’s where I think the postgraduate association or some student head body is a really good support. The key group I was talking to today are in graduate schools, and I was saying to them that they need to be open to students, to go out and talk to students, to make sure they know it’s okay to raise these types of issues. When students are not meeting milestones or hurdles, when things are going wrong, don’t just send an email saying, “You’re falling behind.” Contact the students and ask, “How are things going? Do we need to do something about this?” Use those early warning signs to pick up on some of the issues. As for the students themselves, it’s hard for them because they’re isolated. When you’re doing a PhD or research degree, it’s just you and your supervisor, so you don’t have cohorts of people around you. That’s why I think postgrad associations are important as a way of doing that. Is there anything else about this issue that you would like to mention? In the UK earlier this year, a group called the Higher Education Funding Council for England (now called the Office for Students) gave out £1.5 million ($2.7 million) in grants, spread over about 17 universities, to look at mental health issues and what could be done to prime the pump and get things going. We should be doing something similar in Australia – raising the issues, putting some funding into looking at options and solutions, and getting this on the agenda and talking more about it. Most people are very aware of these problems, but that’s not enough. They have to do something about it, and to argue for more funding from government bodies, the university or whatever group may have funding or an interest in this topic. Were the people who heard your talk today receptive to that message? Yes. I was a bit concerned about how they were going to feel because I was basically telling them, “You need to do more.” But I think most people nodded and agreed yes, this is a problem. They’re very aware because they see it day to day, but sometimes it’s not very clear what needs to be done. My suggestion was that you have to start arguing for more support. Start lobbying within your own university and then more widely to say, “We have to put some effort behind some of these things.” According to a study published by Ghent University in Belgium last year, about a third of their respondents had symptoms of mental health issues. That’s a lot of people. So I was saying to the audience today that when you’re sending out an email to a student, or sending them information, remember that a third of those people might not be in a very good place, and might not respond very well if you’re telling them, “Things aren’t going well, here’s your problem.” So be aware of that, and be a little more thoughtful in the way you communicate your ideas – bear in mind that there’s a person at the other end. ■ 15