Campus Review Volume 28 - Issue 3 | March 2018 | Page 5

news campusreview.com.au • •  rograms taught by teams of Indigenous staff P Interactive online settings with lessons adapted to community needs. NOTHING ABOUT US WITHOUT US: STUDENTS AS PARTNERS Natasha Abrahams (centre) and Mark Pace with seminar chair ANU deputy vice-chancellor Professor Marnie Hughes-Warrington. Personal VC, Natasha Abrahams • • • • •  egular careers fairs, with potential for them to be segmented R (e.g. hosting one specifically for international students) More focus on cadetship programs and learning within industry Opt-in tutorials for small-group, face-to-face discussions on course content More direct engagement as to what students want to get involved in, or why they feel they can’t get involved (e.g. no childcare centres on campus) Student-led initiatives. International VC, Bijay Sapkota • • • • • • •  aculty-specific advisers and career advisory services F Frequent visits by industry leaders Support for marginalised students to increase retention rate Smoother processes for international students, particularly in times of crisis Funded counselling and financial planning Leniency with special consideration Focus on the question: What is our responsibility to shape this world as a whole? Indigenous VC, Sharlene Leroy-Dyer • • • •  learer job pathways, including cadetships and C entrepreneurial programs Grow proportion of Indigenous academics and support staff Build culturally appropriate student centres Programs delivered online and face to face in Aboriginal communities: ‘don’t come to us, we’ll come to you’ approach Sharlene Leroy-Dyer (left) and Bijay Sapkota with Professor Marnie Hughes-Warrington (right). A second session of the conference took on similar themes to the panel, and looked at the benefits of partnering with students to improve higher education, as well as successful examples of collaborative projects between staff and students. The seminar was kicked off by University of Queensland PhD candidate Lucy Mercer-Mapstone. “I believe deeply in the creativity that comes from university students and staff collaborating,” she said. “Emotional intelligence and good human skills both come from partnerships, and we need to have shared responsibility for the learning endeavour. “We’ve mastered giving students a voice, but we have a long way to go when it comes to student action. Too many students are still considered as passive consumers of knowledge.” Mercer-Mapstone defined student action as a progression from giving students a voice, which involves placing students in the role of co-creators, experts and agents of change. Bringing international experience to the table, University of East Anglia vice-chancellor Professor David Richardson built on this concept, citing examples of student-led initiatives that achieved the otherwise unachievable. Richardson’s main example was the university’s Never OK campaign. The project saw students charged with creating a project to tackle racism, discrimination and sexual assault on campus, and resulted in a series of graffiti-style messages raising awareness across campus. Richardson said such a campaign illustrated how students better communicated with their peers, and possessed a wealth of creative ideas that could improve campus life and education outcomes. “I’ve seen universities develop in a positive way when we realise the potential of partnership – when we place students as co-producers and co-designers of education,” he said. “I don’t think we should fall into the trap of just seeing students as consumers. It’s a culture shift that can be uncomfortable for senior staff, but I feel it’s my job to lead that change. “If you work with students, you get creative solutions which are far more impactful than you would have come up with by yourself.” Other successful examples included a collaboration between the University of Queensland and its student union to create a sexual misconduct policy and mental health strategy. University of Technology Sydney Professor Sally Varnham said knowing the benefits of collaboration, universities should aim to create their own genuine partnerships with students. “It requires a mindset change from what we’ve had previously in Australian universities,” she said. “Partnership is an ethos not an activity. Students are the university and the university is the students, but sometimes that gets forgotten. “It’s like a gym membership. You can’t just sign up and then loiter around and expect to get fit – you have to do something about it.” ■ 3