Campus Review Volume 28 - Issue 11 | November 2018 | Page 26

VET & TAFE campusreview.com.au SUMMARY FINDINGS AQF 5/6 Course analysis What to make of AQF levels 5 and 6. By Craig Fowler T his article examines Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) levels 5 and 6 and the overlap between VET diploma and above and higher education (HE) sub-bachelor courses. The ambitious questions being asked are: •  What is the quantum of private investment, public subsidy and financing by all governments (including longer-term costs to government of any unpaid loans) on both sides of the VET/HE AQF 5/6 ‘divide’? •  Does choice of course and costs drive student behaviour? •  What are the educational, skills and employment benefits to students and employers? These are important policy questions, and they are relevant to employers who expect both discipline knowledge and technical skills in the graduates they employ. It is also the junction point with pathways between the sectors. While the explanations below fall short of the stated ambition, current evidence and pertinent issues are summarised. A link to the full version of this article is available at CampusReview.com.au. 24 Enrolment numbers and fields of education Although total enrolments in publicly funded/financed AQF 5/6 VET diplomas and above are greater in number than AQF 5/6 HE sub-bachelor enrolments, recent trends show VET diplomas are in sharp decline, with the close of VET FEE-HELP and tight controls on courses/costs/providers under the VET Student Loans program. While domestic enrolments in VET diplomas are sharply declining, international enrolments in VET diplomas are increasing, being near half of all international VET enrolments, with the majority from China and with most students intending to go on to HE study. There is evidence of sustained yet modest growth in domestic HE sub-bachelor enrolments with enrolments in 2016 of similar but less number to those reported under VET Student Loans for 2017. HE and VET AQF 5/6 providers similarly promote the educational and work-skill benefits of their courses. There are overlaps in enrolments by Field of Education (FoE). ‘Management and commerce’ and ‘society and culture’ dominate in both HE (associate degree, diplomas) and VET enrolments (diploma and above). ‘Health’ (e.g. nursing), ‘education’ and ‘creative arts’ show the next highest enrolments and overlaps. ‘Natural sciences’ dominate in HE enrolments, while ‘food hospitality and personal services’ is near exclusive to VET. Student views and surveys Evidence from graduate surveys shows firmer distinctions in students’ reasons for study. VET diploma students state work- related reasons for subject enrolments (‘get a better job’, ‘needed for work’, ‘get promoted’), and as graduates generally rate work benefits of VET training higher than HE diploma graduates, VET diplomas (AQF 5) are built more overtly for vocational purposes. HE diploma graduates by contrast tend to see their qualification as less relevant to employment, and rather as providing pathways to higher academic learning, or other professional pursuits such as foreign languages. That said, students use both VET and HE AQF 5/6 courses as effective pathways to higher AQF studies. Institutional promotion and marketing The overall pitch and rhetoric by universities in presenting the benefits of sub-bachelor programs are much the same as those long espoused by VET providers. Universities have greater marketing power in offering sub- bachelor courses compared with training providers offering VET diplomas in a similar FoE. This is for reasons of perceived prestige and pathways which in some cases lead into the second year of bachelor degree study. Universities also have the ability to ‘self‑accredit’ courses and have preferred funding/financing arrangements. Some 36 institutions were identified as straddling the VET/HE boundary: that is, registered as both HE provider and approved VET Student Loan provider. These institutions comprised 12 universities (including dual sector) and 11 TAFEs. Collaboration and pathways Where there are student pathways straddling VET and HE AQF 5/6, these typically have been cooperatively negotiated ‘ground up’ between institutions, not facilitated by national policy ‘top down’. Examples of collaborative local and regional solutions take time and resources to create. Where universities (dual sector or their colleges) are approved as VET Student Loan providers and have grant contracts for HE sub-bachelor ‘designated places’, they have the potential benefit of two student entry pathways, both at AQF 5/6, and can also decide requirements for student entry into AQF 7 levels. Universities also have access to HEPPP funding to improve access by students from low SES backgrounds. Public funding and financing – VET Public funding and financing of VET AQF 5/6 courses is complex, being the sum of (unknown) state/territory government subsidies of VET diplomas and higher-level VET qualifications, as well as Australian government-financed VET Student Loans (some with state/territory subsidy), plus the uncertain future costs to governments of any unpaid loans. The amount paid to course providers in respect of VET Student Loans approved for students studying eligible courses in 2017 was over $200 million (full-year 2017). Of the 211 approved course providers (at May 2018), 155 providers had students who accessed a VET Student Loan in 2017, with there being in total 42,220 loan-assisted students. Students may enrol on a full-fee-for- service basis and trigger a 20 per cent loan fee if they borrow for such a purpose. If their enrolment is (minimally) subsidised by a state or territory government there is no loan fee, but conversely were a student’s employer to pay such a subsidy, a loan fee still applies.