Campus Review Volume 28 - Issue 11 | November 2018 | Page 21

industry & research campusreview.com.au of learning, not the medium, and the model is competency-based learning. Carnegie Mellon University did a study that showed if you’re using this model, you learn in about half the amount of time, and score higher on exams. Take any program you can think of – like nursing, education, or medicine – you should have to master certain competencies before you're allowed to practise or teach. Where does the teacher fit into this model? A faster way to learn Is competency-based learning the future for universities? John Baker interviewed by Loren Smith W hen principal of Templestowe College, Peter Hutton, was at school, like many of us, he was told that one day the esoteric-seeming knowledge he gained would be useful. “That hasn’t happened yet,” Hutton quipped at a recent event. Perhaps this would have been different had he learned via a competency model – one that instils testable skills rather than abstract knowledge. Canadian, John Baker, is a huge proponent of this model, which he facilitates via his company D2L (Desire2Learn). Campus Review met Baker for coffee, where he explained why competency- based learning is the way the world is going, and why that’s a good thing. CR: Can you give an overview of what your company does? JB: I started D2L [a cloud software company] in my third year at university. I was wrestling with a key question: “What’s the most important problem I could solve that would have the biggest impact in the world?” I couldn’t think of anything bigger than transforming the way the world learns, because I look at learning as a core to solving all the world’s major challenges. So I started with digitising learning. Then I thought, "How do I make that experience more meaningful?" I thought of enrichment pathways to help people achieve what they want, faster, so they have spare time to pursue something that they’re really passionate about. They’re a game changer. Places like Southern New Hampshire University, the largest university in the US, are growing very, very fast [because they use efficient learning methods]. SNHU was a 3000 student campus in Connecticut, and now they’ve skyrocketed using this type of education that’s helping people acquire knowledge more efficiently. But the other big piece is, how do we help remake study? If you look at the very old definition of studying, which comes from the Latin root, it meant desire, passion, excitement, pursuit. I think if we can remake the education system so we can be more productive, that would allow us more time for the pursuit of whatever we’re passionate about: being a better dancer, entrepreneur, lawyer, researcher, exploring our communities, exploring big problems. By increasing efficiency, do you mean by using technology? Not necessarily. It’s about the model It’s not that this replaces a teacher; it actually enables a teacher to be more of what we hope, which is connecting with students, giving them great feedback, getting them engaged, and helping them persevere through challenges, versus standing and writing down things on a chalkboard. Can you talk about how it works in practice? Imagine going to an ‘Intro to Law’ or ‘Intro to Calculus’ course. Instead of [simply] being given an assignment, a quiz, or a group activity, you understand the competencies that you must gain to pass the course, and how the evaluations will assess your mastery of them. As you’re going through the course, you’re seeing indicators showing you how well you’re doing. If you haven’t achieved a competency, new learning activities can be created to help you do so. I feel like those objectives have always been there, but perhaps they haven’t been the primary measurement of success or progression. When you’re doing a quiz or an exam, it’s assessing a lot of those but there’s not a direct line between [the task and the competency]. I think that’s the main difference. Do you think this model results in students graduating with a better understanding of their course? Yes, I think that’s one key outcome, and then also being able speak the language of companies. So if they’re going to go off into industry, the ability for them to say, “Well, here’s how I’ve done research. Here’s how I’ve problem-solved. Here’s how I’ve demonstrated critical thinking.” All the skill sets that these folks [employers] are looking for.  ■ 19