Campus Review Volume 28 - Issue 1 | January 2018 | Page 27

ON CAMPUS campusreview.com.au St Paul’s 2.0? Photo: St Paul’s, via Facebook Will a change of leadership result in a more diverse and inclusive culture for one of Sydney’s most notorious colleges? By Loren Smith T he oldest university college in Australia, St Paul’s at the University of Sydney, is no stranger to scandal. In May last year, the 200-resident, ‘liberal Anglican’ all-male establishment became the centre of controversy when the following post appeared on the ‘St Paul’s 2017’ Facebook page: “G’day Lads, If you ever want to get rid of some chick who either (a) won’t leave your room after a root in the morning or (b) if you’ve harpooned a whale and she’s taking the whole bed preventing all chances of sleep, I’ll be there with a purposeful c—kblock to rescue you. Simply message me the code word “argh” and your room number and I’ll be there with a well thought out lie (terrifying lump on penis, broken foot or personal emergency) which requires your immediate assistance and her immediate exit. Happy slaying.” It was ‘liked’ almost 100 times. To make matters worse, St Paul’s published a statement on its Facebook page warning residents that “incautious or disrespectful” social media posts “may resurface just when you need your best CV to work for you”. It was later deleted and replaced with a wholly condemnatory statement. Now, for the first time since 1994, the college has a new leader. But will Dr Donald Markwell usher in a culture change? Markwell attended the University of Queensland, and was then selected as Rhodes Scholar for Queensland for 1981. Leadership stints at the universities of Oxford, Melbourne and Western Australia followed. Most recently, he served as senior adviser to the attorney-general and leader of the government in the Senate, and is also the former global head of the Rhodes Scholarships. His aims for St Paul’s include it “being a centre of excellence, not a bastion of privilege”, as well as enhancing diversity. These could be difficult to fulfil, given the college charges a base per semester residency fee of $12,825, and offers just seven full-fee (and numerous partial, up to half fee) scholarships annually. Markwell notes his fundraising credentials – he was instrumental in vastly increasing the number of Indigenous residents at Melbourne’s Trinity College – and says he will use these to maximise the provision of scholarships at St Paul’s. A more concrete, diversity-minded move to be implemented during his tenure is the college’s acceptance of 140 postgraduate men and women from 2019. ‘Respect for men and women alike’ is another of his aspirations for the college. In this sense, it seems he truly might best his predecessor. A clearly imparted message of zero tolerance of sexual misconduct is his policy cornerstone in this regard. He also has ideas about changing the ‘iconography’ of the college by, for instance, switching up the portraiture that lines its walls, to perhaps convey a more gender-equal tone. He will also monitor the types of activities permitted at the college, to minimise the risk of sexual misconduct. However, he denies this is a bigger issue in residential colleges than in other university settings. This is contrary to a finding in the Australian Human Rights Commission’s report on sexual harassment and assault on campus: ‘residential settings’ was one of four “recurring themes in incidents of sexual assault and sexual harassment that occurred in university settings”. Curiously, USYD recently received a report from former sex discrimination commissioner Elizabeth Broderick on the cultural renewal at its residential colleges. Notably, St Paul’s was not one of the five commissioning colleges. Nonetheless, Markwell’s vision for St Paul’s exceeds restoration. It centres on the idea of residential colleges as the settings of ideal educational experiences. He wishes for the college to be akin to famed ones in Oxford and Harvard, for example, where students are utterly immersed in academic, extracurricular, social and – depending on the college’s orientation – religious life. “Almost all of the world’s greatest universities are collegiate, or at least residential, universities,” he says. However, he doesn’t wear rose-tinted glasses. In a speech, he admitted that “colleges can become places where conformism, sexism, sexual harassment and worse, racism, anti-intellectualism and an over-emphasis on alcohol have damaged students. “Sometimes the camaraderie, mutual support and college spirit that many value goes too far and effectively demands that individuals conform to behaviour that they do not like.” In his experience, with good leadership, they can become the opposite. ■ 25