policy & reform campusreview. com. au
When did human rights become racist?
A reflection on relativism in Australian education.
By Ines Dunstan
I
am an agnostic left-leaning history academic and a high school teacher committed to the defence of human rights and, in the era of alternative facts, truth and civility. I had always assumed that most humanities teachers in this country, regardless of political leanings, were in the same boat.
The first signs that this was not the case, and that something was seriously amiss, came some years ago, when I began lecturing in Australian history. My 17 and 18-year-old students, most of whom were studying to become teachers, were arguing in their essays that Hitler should not be judged, and that we should always uphold a balanced view about history. Judging Hitler( yes, Hitler) was unbalanced. Paper after paper argued that there was no truth, just perspectives, all of which were equally valid or equally questionable.
The sheer number of teenagers upholding this hollow and extreme cultural and moral relativist credo alarmed me. I made it a point to clarify the distinction between historical‘ balance’ and‘ genocidal leaders’, but the same argument kept coming up, essay after essay. I mentioned this to a senior colleague, who shrugged her shoulders and exclaimed:“ It’ s what they get taught at school.”
The second time I felt completely disoriented took place not long afterwards. I was chatting to a very knowledgeable gender studies professor and I commented that female mutilation is a human rights abuse. The academic, a life-long campaigner for the equal rights of gay and transgender people, and an advocate for female sexual liberation, looked shocked and told me that I was being judgmental.
The comment completely threw me off. How could I be judgmental? This was, after all, a practice that left women in acute pain for the rest of their lives. It was a practice that ruined their sexual lives. It was a practice condemned by the UN. But the academic
10