Campus Review Volume 27. Issue 06 | June 17 | Página 27

ON CAMPUS campusreview.com.au Photo: Sally Tsoutas External street view. Photo: Bryan Siebel Photo: Sally Tsoutas and to staff from PwC, but also a number of the other businesses in the region. Surprisingly, the new campus does not have any lecture theatres – what was the thinking behind this? It was a very conscious decision. It is part of our belief about the future of learning and teaching, so we have no lecture theatres. We’ve designed very interactive, very technically rich learning studios. We re-developed our curriculum and we’ve supported a new approach to teaching for our staff. What we believe is that we should create the environment and the learning experiences that encourage our students to be actively engaged in learning rather than sitting passively in a lecture theatre. So we may be the first to not build lecture theatres in our new building, but many universities are recognising the somewhat limited pedagogic value of lectures, and the much deeper learning that is derived when students are actively engaged in working through problems, connecting with ideas, working with their peers, and interacting with staff around the real questions and the real issues. Beyond the lack of lecture theatres, there seems to be a focus on enabling students to work digitally with their peers, is that correct? Yes. We’ve set up our learning studios in a way that encourages collaborative work, but also supports individual work. The spaces are set up to support group work. Students will bring their own devices in. We have software through the rooms that allow students to share the document they’re working on or the problem they’re solving, or the graph they’re developing. They can just share it with each other on their own devices, but each group table has a large monitor and computer screen. They can throw their documents and their images up, so every member of the group could put the document that he or she is working on up so that the group can see every document at once, or they can choose the best worked example and talk their way through it. Photo: Nicole England A teacher, an academic, might identify that there’s a particularly elegant solution that one of the students has come up with that can be shared with everybody, either to their table screens or to big screens on the wall. So that’s one aspect of it – making it rich in terms of collaboration. Another component is that we have writable walls. Everybody loves white boards; students love to work their solutions and their problems out on the white boards, but we can capture that on camera and then share it onto screens. We can share it with somebody at a remote location, so either an expert or a professional or a guest academic on another site, or we can involve students who for whatever reason can’t make it to class. So would you say this is about structuring learning in a way that perhaps more closely resembles what their workplace will be like when they do enter the workforce? That has certainly informed our thinking about not only the design of the learning spaces, but the whole environment in the building – this is the home of predominantly our School of Business – and we believe this creates the sort of environment our students are going to work in when they graduate, and some of them are already working in it. It’s a familiar environment, it’s very modern, it’s very contemporary, it’s rich technologically in terms of the room booking system, the information about the building, the information about transport, the digital way- finding throughout the building. So we know students will be working in environments that require them to be highly collaborative, that require them to interact and use technologies well. We believe we’re going to equip our students with those skill sets and develop their skills in working well collaboratively, working with a range of different people, working in an open and flexible environment, and being very comfortable using technology to support collaboration and to deliver all of their work. ■ 25