Campus Review Vol 30. Issue 08 - Aug 2020 | Page 22

INDUSTRY & RESEARCH campusreview.com.au Future focus UniMelb researchers investigate how we can ‘future proof’ students for the 21st century. Sandra Milligan interviewed by Wade Zaglas Professor Sandra Milligan from the University of Melbourne and her fellow experts were inspired to write the report 'Future Proofing Students: What they need to know and how educators can assess and credential them' after noticing a disconnect between "what teachers want students to learn and how they are credentialed" or assessed. The authors of the report also found that employers often knew little of what a student could really do based on a report card. Students, too, often complained that some credentials didn't reflect who they really were. Campus Review spoke to Milligan about this issue as well as the skills all students will require now and into the future. Depending on the context, these skills are called different things: soft skills, 21st century skills, general capabilities and graduate qualities. They include teamwork and collaboration, communication in a range of forms, critical and creative thinking, and problem solving, to name a few. Milligan refers to them as "learning skills" as they are essential to the learning process. Milligan also discussed the idea of a learner profile, which allows educators to assess these credentials – or general capabilities in school language – in a more detailed way than a report. She's hoping this new way of assessing credentials gains traction but admits there are big challenges ahead. CR: Why did you and your co-authors decide this was a topic that demanded attention? SM: We work in the Assessment Research Centre at the University of Melbourne, so that means we get a lot of people coming to us when they've got issues to do with their assessment or their credentials. And what we've noticed over the last few years is that people are telling us there's a real mismatch between what they want to teach students and what they want students to learn, and what's assessed and what's credentialed. In other words, the credentials don't match the aspiration to learning. And we found this to be true right across the education sector. For instance, in schools, the Australian curriculum really says you need to learn a lot of things as well as subject content, like chemistry and French and so forth, yet our ATAR and our VCE and HSC credentials usually focus on what can be tested in examinations, quizzes or tests. And it's not really reflecting the whole range of what students know and can do. 20