Campus Review Vol 30. Issue 08 - Aug 2020 | Page 12

policy & reform campusreview.com.au We need to open doors, not narrow pathways. More than a number Push for learner profiles and a broadening of future education choices. By Dallas Bastian The education sector should move away from the heavy focus on ATAR and students should instead leave school with a ‘learner profile’ that takes into account a range of their skills, knowledge and experiences. That was one of the key recommendations to come from a federal review of senior secondary pathways. Led by Professor Peter Shergold, the review looked at whether current arrangements are supporting students to make the best decisions for their future. While the report held that ATAR will likely continue to play a role in university selection processes, learner profiles would mean senior secondary students are seen as young people, not numbers. Such profiles would include ATAR where relevant, individual subject results, VET competencies and certificates, minimum literacy, numeracy and digital literacy achievement and broader capabilities like caring responsibilities, sports achievements and hobbies. The report also pushed for all future pathways to be equally respected. “While higher education will remain an aspiration for many young people, academic pathways will no longer enjoy more privileged access to school resources than apprenticeships, traineeships or other forms of vocational education and training,” the report read. In a letter to ministers, Shergold said: “The present transition pathways presented to young adults at school are too often framed in a manner that they perceive to narrow choice. “The dominance of a ranking score, the ATAR, privileges academic capability over the value of vocational education and training. Many students believe that those headed for university are accorded higher status at school than those who prefer to pursue a trade apprenticeship or traineeship.” Shergold said the ATAR should be regarded as just one important measure of success. “We need to open doors, not narrow pathways.” RMIT backed the report’s findings. The university’s deputy vice-chancellor education and vice-president, Professor Belinda Tynan, said it was clear that significant nationwide change is needed. Tynan said single measurements of success and an over-emphasis on the importance of achieving a competitive ATAR are narrow and can limit opportunities for many young people. Shergold pushed council members to consider the proposal not despite but because of the impact of COVID-19, saying the disruption makes the report’s recommendations “even more relevant”. “Reform can become part of the ‘new normal’. Schools, principals and teachers have exhibited their extraordinary capacity for flexibility and resilience,” he said. “They are up for the challenge. “Never has this been more necessary because the future of work has rarely been more uncertain.” ■ SubScribe for leSS than $5 a week The laTesT news and resources for professionals in The higher educaTion indusTry Campus Review is Australia’s only publication dedicated exclusively to the higher education industry, making it an essential read for those working in the sector. 12 issues per year | Tax-deductible | Written by an independent voice Please call 02 9936 8666 to find out more. 10