Campus Review Vol 29. Issue 7 July 2019 | Page 7

news campusreview.com.au Dr Alison Barnes. Photo: James Croucher/News Corp Court called off Union drops UOW litigation. A ustralia’s tertiary education union has dropped legal action against the University of Wollongong, after the university’s council approved the controversial Ramsay Centre Western civilisation degree in June. The NTEU, which commenced legal action in the Supreme Court of NSW against UOW and its vice-chancellor Professor Paul Wellings for fast-tracking the Ramsay degree, said the council’s decision to approve the degree took “the utility out of litigation” and “shielded” the vice-chancellor from scrutiny. “It looks a lot like the university has taken this action because they know we were right and there was a real case to answer in court,” NTEU president Dr Alison Barnes said. “We initiated the court action against the university because it didn’t follow its normal procedures when it fast-tracked approval for the new course. “The university bypassed its normal academic governance processes, which play a vital role in quality control and are fundamental to ensuring academic integrity $31m termination Alabama uni returns gift, denies abortion link. T he University of Alabama has denied that its decision to return a gift of US$21.5 million ($31 million) had to do with the donor’s pro-abortion views. Hugh Culverhouse Jr pledged to donate $26.5 million over four years and was $5 million short of that target when the university announced recently that its board of trustees had decided to return the gift and remove Culverhouse’s name from its law school. Prior to this, Culverhouse had urged students to boycott the school over Alabama’s recently passed abortion ban. “I expected that speaking out would have consequences, but I never could have imagined the response from the University of Alabama,” Culverhouse wrote in an opinion piece for and quality, and the council has done that again by making this decision. “We condemn the council’s decision because it disregards the overwhelming majority views of its academic staff and the broader university community. “Just because the council’s decision is legal doesn’t make it the right decision. The council decision underscores the lengths to which university managements have gone to erode the centrality of academic governance within universities.” UOW has welcomed the union’s decision. Wellings said fast track approval is a “well-established process [that] has been used regularly by successive UOW vice- chancellors for more than two decades, including for approving whole courses". He added the union's decision “vindicates” the university’s position. “I welcome the NTEU’s decision not to expend further valuable member funds on this challenge," he said. "The university can now continue to make rapid progress establishing this new degree.” Wellings said he is satisfied with the quality of the degree and proud to be offering it in a newly built Liberal Arts School.  ■ The Washington Post. “It has been painful to witness administrators at the university choose zealotry over the wellbeing of its own students, but it’s another example of the damage this attack on abortion rights will do to Alabama.” However, via a statement, the University of Alabama said the decision was “never about the issue of abortion” and was rather “always about ending the continued outside interference by the donor” in the School of Law’s operations. To back this up, the university released a string of emails that show a number of requests Culverhouse sent to the school’s dean, including those surrounding staff appointments and student admissions, and that his visits to the campus be mostly unrestricted. In its statement, the university also said chancellor Finis St John’s decision to return the gift came four days before Culverhouse’s public comments about abortion. The attached emails also appear to show Culverhouse asking for the return of $10 million, but he previously clarified to NPR that he intended to pay it back over the schedule, rather than have it sit unused in the university’s coffers. When asked earlier by NPR why he believed the decision to return his gift was tied to his stance on abortion, Culverhouse responded: “First, the timing. Second, the timing. Third, the timing.” In the interview, Culverhouse said he always intended to be involved in the school well beyond a name on a stone tablet, and had made that clear in his speech announcing the gift,. A university statement that details comments made by St John to the board of trustees reads: “We will learn from this – and always remember that we cannot and will not compromise the values of academic integrity and independent administration at any price.”  ■ 5