Campus Review Vol 29. Issue 7 July 2019 | Page 11

FACULTY FOCUS campusreview.com.au Why do you think heavy metal and its various subgenres have originated in those northern countries? Photo: AFP Photo / Jean-Sebastien Evrard Studies, and every couple of years they organise a conference. There have been a few events like that, but as far as scholarships go, I think this might be the first. But don’t quote me on that! Why is the subject worthy of research? I’m trained as a geographer, so I’m looking at this through a geographical lens. Heavy metal music, and its culture, has been around for 50 years at least, and it’s been transmitted all over the globe. There are various forms of metal scenes in any given country. That, in itself, is fascinating: something that had its origins in UK culture and the British rock scene developed into something called heavy metal, and it’s been transmitted around the planet and taken up in various ways and integrated with a variety of different cultures. As far as taking this seriously as an academic study, academics study all sorts of different things, and cultural forms is part of that, of course. As a social and cultural geographer, that’s what interests me. People do it for all kinds of various forms of media. Whether it’s other forms of music, or film or literature, there are all kinds of different things that are cultural products that we can take an academic lens to. Heavy metal is just one of them. We have to take a long view of this and think historically about the way the world has evolved into the place it is today. That involves asking some questions about the history of colonialism. So, if we’re talking about a long perspective, we can see that the UK, or England, was obviously one of the key colonisers on the planet. With that not only came economic forms of control but also the diffusion of a particular cultural form. Obviously, this was before something called heavy metal existed, but the ongoing legacies of colonialism have meant that the cultural forms that have originated in Europe, and also the United States, are one of the key economic players in the world today. These cultural forms continue to be transmitted because of the ongoing influence and power that came from those earlier colonial trajectories and continue into the present. If we’re going to look at what’s happening today, then, we can look at the diffusion of colonialism in the past and its ongoing implications in the present. This isn’t to say that there’s an imposition of heavy metal as a form of colonialism, but rather to say that heavy metal is a product of a particular moment in time, a particular cultural form, and its uptake in diffusion is part of that longer process. Certainly, in any given country, it would be taken up to a greater or lesser extent and perhaps even resisted in some contexts. And you know, in most instances it’s been embraced as something to be welcomed and celebrated and to be, I suppose, meshed with the local existing culture. So we see in places as diverse as Indonesia, Brazil and South Africa the local elements of culture – whether that’s musical or whether that’s in terms of lyrical content – have been incorporated into the kind of heavy metal music that’s coming out of those scenes. We know that many other cultural products like literature, film and art have been worthy of academic inquiry for a very long time. Why do you think heavy metal hasn’t been seen as a serious academic subject? What’s been fascinating for me is the way the media has picked up on this story and taken such an interest in it. It gives credence to the idea that there is actually something to study here. To answer your question and to reflect on why there has been so much interest, I think it’s because, traditionally, heavy metal has been thought of as a lower cultural form, if you will. That it’s a lowbrow form of art and not to be taken seriously. Of course, I would argue that this is a problematic stereotype, because the musicianship and the poeticism in some of the lyrics are very advanced. Metal musicians are some of the most proficient musicians on the planet. You take that stereotype of metal as a negative kind of thing and contrast it with academia, which is often put on a pedestal. It’s also a cultural form of its own, right? They’re considered polar opposites, and I’m trying to suggest that they’re not. There’s actually a conduit between them. I don’t know how many heavy metal musicians would be interested in academia per se, but from an academic perspective, heavy metal is something that I think is worthy of academic investigation, precisely because as I mentioned before, it’s been around such a long time. It’s a lasting cultural form, whether people want to embrace it and accept it, or turn their nose up at it. It’s interesting to see the kind of responses it provokes. At the same time, it’s not something that’s going away soon, so we might as well examine it for what it’s worth and see what comes out of it. In terms of what benefits studying it might have for contemporary society in general, I think there are lessons we can learn from heavy metal culture. One of those lessons is the unity that’s involved. Many heavy metal fans find a deep Heavy metal is a lasting cultural form, whether people want to embrace it and accept it, or turn their nose up at it. affinity for one another. It crosses language barriers, it crosses religious barriers, and people just come together around this idea of their love for a certain form of music. That kind of connectivity and potential to build community, I think, is a lesson that society can learn. ■ 9