Campus Review Vol 29. Issue 5 May 2019 | Página 18

industry & research campusreview.com.au If professional learning is to remain a critical part of the ongoing development of teachers, more meaningful, ongoing and evidence-based projects between universities and schools are required. Campus Review spoke to Ryan about the need for purposeful and measurable professional learning in education and ways this could be realised. CR: Little evidence seems to exist to support the professional learning that teachers engage in. Even though we might know it’s beneficial, there’s a lack of hard evidence to back it up. How did this situation develop? Improving professional learning for teachers Leveraging university knowledge to strengthen professional learning in schools. Mary Ryan interviewed by Wade Zaglas T eachers could be forgiven for approaching professional learning with a degree of ambivalence. With unrelenting administrative tasks, classroom teaching, preparation and marking, there is always the risk that such learning becomes an encumbrance, a ‘tick the box’ registration requirement rather than the critical development tool it is. While many one-off sessions can be useful – learning a new digital tool, for example – engaging teachers in more targeted, continuous and evidence-based projects is likely to yield great results in terms of teaching practice and student achievement. One of the best ways of achieving this is to foster more collaboration between 16 universities and school communities. According to Macquarie University professor Mary Ryan, much professional learning in the past has lacked “a holistic, evidence- based practice approach”. Through analysing “small data” like school assessment and “big data” such as standardised tests, teachers can often see improvement, but pinpointing the specific practices that have caused it requires more rigorous observation and analysis. Take, for instance, this simple professional learning scenario. A Year 6 teacher attends a session on improving students’ spelling skills. Without a system to collect and analyse the effects of the session on teaching practice and student achievement, the teacher will have little idea of what specific practices have made a difference. Simply put, too many “puzzles of practice” exist. Enter the university sector. With their wealth of research knowledge, practical experience and passion for project design, academics are well-placed to assist classroom teachers in understanding their learners’ needs and developing a suitable professional learning project. In doing so, they will draw on not only the assessment data above, but the wider body of academic research that teachers have little time to access and divulge. In Ryan’s words, academics will be able “to curate the research evidence for teachers” and help them design project models that suit their learning contexts. MR: Firstly, I’d like to differentiate between data, research evidence, and practice-based evidence. Teachers use data all the time in their teaching. That’s what assessment is. And sometimes teachers don’t think about it as data, but classroom assessment is what I would call ‘small data’. Then we have ‘big data’, which includes those large standardised data sets. Teachers do use data in their teaching, and they also use it to look at their student outcomes and achievements. Research shows that teachers tend to get their information from other teachers. They don’t always go to research, they go to other teachers for information about improving practice and so on. This is fantastic, because we want teachers to be having these professional conversations with each other and forming a professional learning community. But while professional judgment is important, it’s only one form of evidence. What we need to think about is a holistic, evidence-based practice approach. Evidence-based practice includes some different kinds of evidence. There’s the big and small data I talked about – that’s important for us to fold in, to have a look at student learning outcomes and how they’re performing at a local level, but also how they might compare to look at trends across the country and across nations. There’s also teacher practice evidence, where we look at our own practice. We might go to a professional learning session for example, and we might learn about new things that we could do in the classroom. This comes back to the professional learning community, which is powerful in schools. When schools have that collaborative, collective approach, they actually observe each other’s teaching, they have conversations about their teaching, they talk about the improvement. You know