Campus Review Vol. 29 Issue 4 - April 2019 | Page 12

policy & reform campusreview.com.au How to Colonise 101 A student complaint prompts Griffith University to change how a First Peoples course is delivered. By Kate Prendergast A student at Griffith University has called out a professor for promoting a colonial version of history in a first-year Indigenous studies class. The complaint has prompted Griffith to change the method of the course’s delivery. In a 729-word public post on his Facebook page published on 27 March, student Andrew Beitzel accused Professor Regina Ganter of championing a white saviour narrative, and framing German missionaries’ interaction with Australia’s Indigenous peoples as more positive than problematic. Beitzel’s post was accompanied by 25 images of the class’s PowerPoint slides. At the time of writing, the post has attracted 2400 reactions, 1500 comments and 1300 shares. Professor Ganter, who is a non- Indigenous German woman, is the convener of the 12-week First Peoples (1088LHS) course at Griffith’s Gold Coast campus and, in the original course outline, was the lecturer of half of its classes. A professor of Australian history in the School of Humanities, she has a long and established career collaborating with Indigenous communities and academics, and has published numerous papers on Australia’s Indigenous history, present and inter-cultural encounters. She has also sat on the Research Advisory Committee for the Australian Institute of Aboriginal 10 and Torres Strait Islander Studies, and developed an ARC-funded project on German missionaries in Australia. Beitzel, however, a descendent of the Stolen Generations, took issue with the class’s content and tone. “I knew it was going to be bad when the first slide was a picture of a German missionary handing Aboriginal children lollies as gifts, presented without comment,” he wrote. Finding her preamble on the German Enlightenment and Hegelian dialectics far from germane, Beitzel said, “The lecturer proceeded to talk about the, in her words, ‘German difference’ in missions, and how German missions were better for Aboriginal peoples than English-run missions.” He also alleges the professor claimed that “missionaries prevented genocide”, and that the course itself was created without consultation with local Indigenous Elders impacted by the Stolen Generations. “We never needed our souls to be saved, and we never needed our culture to be taken from us from missionaries who were here illegally … This class is teaching white students to effectively be colonisers, learning a history from a white perspective that uses Aboriginal accounts that only further a pro-mission bias.” In an official response, Professor Paul Mazerolle, pro-vice-chancellor (arts, education and law) at Griffith University, stood by Ganter, defending her “excellent reputation” and pointing to her distinguished career working in the Indigenous studies field and with the Indigenous community. The university has nonetheless treated the student’s complaint seriously and taken a number of steps to address the concerns raised. Following the incident and the social media-driven outcry, a meeting was convened between Ganter; the co-chairs of Griffith’s Council of Elders; staff from the Office of Indigenous Community Engagement, Policy and Partnerships; and the GUMURRII Student Support Unit. From this meeting came a collective recommendation that the university’s Indigenous studies major “be led and primarily delivered by an Indigenous teaching team”. The university intends to act on this recommendation and make more Indigenous appointments to teach in the major. Griffith also says Ganter previously advocated for this method of delivery. Griffith and Ganter subsequently agreed that “the remainder of the First Peoples course will now be taught by an Indigenous academic”, Mazerolle said. Mazerolle and the head of school also met with Beitzel in an effort to fully understand his concerns about the First Peoples course. In a separate meeting, Beitzel spoke with GUMURRII and members of the Council of Elders for “support and guidance in relation to the complaint processes at the university”, Mazerolle said. “Our focus is on ensuring the best outcomes for students in the course.” The First Peoples course is described on Griffith University’s website as an examination of what it means to be Indigenous today, and looks at “the structures of disadvantage and sources of Indigenous empowerment in a transnational context”.  ■