Campus Review Vol. 29 Issue 3 - March 2019 | Page 5

campusreview.com.au Arty smarties Students who study creative arts are more likely to get better grades, research shows. W ould you steer a Year 6, 7 or 8 student away from ‘soft’ subjects like art and music to harder ones like maths and English? Is your job safe from robots? New university tool breaks down the likelihood of automation in specific jobs. I s a robot coming for your job? That’s the question a new predictive tool asks. It calculates a person’s exposure to automation and other sources of change in a job and predicts future developments. news Intuitively, it seems that ‘fluffier’ subjects allow for fun and creativity alone. A new study, however, shows that creative arts subjects like theatre and dance improve numeracy and literacy scores. Researchers from George Mason University in Virginia followed more than 10,000 mostly low-income Florida students from Kindergarten to Year 8. After controlling for all other variables, they discovered that those who undertook creative arts subjects in middle school (Years 6–8) “went on to earn significantly higher GPAs and higher standardised math and reading scores, and were less likely to get suspended from school, compared to students who were not exposed to arts classes”. These students also “showed stronger social, behavioural, language, motor and cognitive skills seven years earlier in preschool”, which appears to suggest that more capable students tend to choose arts electives. Yet the link between arts and high grades was established even when the researchers controlled for these skills. “These are meaningful, important and ecologically valid measures of actual student performance,” the researchers wrote in ‘Predictors of, and Benefits From, Elective Arts Classes (Music, Drama, Visual Art, Dance) in Middle School among Ethnically Diverse Children in Poverty’, published in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. With black students the least likely to be enrolled in arts classes, they contended that access to arts education “can be seen as an issue of social justice”.  ■ “Experts predict 50 per cent of all jobs will be lost by 2030,” the tool warns. “Enter your details and in less than a minute find out how exposed you are.” Developed by the University of New England, the Future of Work Predictor breaks down the Australian economy into over 3000 different jobs and then thousands of separate tasks to determine the degree of likely change. For example, the tool says a Sydney-based journalist with a bachelor’s degree should expect to write much more advertising, promotional or informational material in a decade, while spending less time providing educational information to the public and collaborating with others in marketing activities. Meanwhile, a university lecturer with a master’s degree living in Melbourne should expect less change to their profession than the journalist. Although, the predictor says that by 2030 they would spend less time advising students on academic and career matters and more time attending training sessions or professional meetings to develop or maintain professional knowledge. Both the journalist and the lecturer can expect that their job will be relatively unaffected by the impact of automation, as well as the need to be more productive, and supply and demand. The Future of Work Predictor also walks users through wages and employment growth and how their qualification compares to others in their occupation. The University of New England team used economic modelling firm AlphaBeta to figure out the degree of change for each occupation.  ■ 3