Campus Review Vol. 29 Issue 3 - March 2019 | Page 27

workforce campusreview.com.au Dr Kevin Larkin receives his award from UA chair Professor Margaret Gardner (left) and La Trobe’s deputy vice-chancellor (academic) Professor Kerri-Lee Krause. was social and behavioural sciences. There’s a physical sciences category, law category, and so on. But that’s all you know. You know that overall one of those seven people will be selected as the University Teacher of the Year, but you don’t know who it is. So, it was really surprising when the professor read my name out. It was a little bit overwhelming, really. But I’m very proud of working for Griffith and what they’ve allowed me to achieve. On that note, I saw that you have an equation that summarises your teaching methods. Can you briefly explain what it is and what it means? to do it properly, you have to give a lot of yourself.” Aside from his love of education, Campus Review spoke to Larkin about maths engagement, teacher attrition and, of course, his formula for success. CR: Did the win surprise you? KL: Yes. The way the awards work is there are seven categories for the individual award. There are also some program and team categories. So, you know that you’ve been successful in your category, so mine It’s just a way of trying to frame what I do with students. It’s not strictly a mathematical equation, I’m using the term equation a little bit loosely, but what I try to do is, firstly, with any of my teaching, establish positive relationships with people. That applies to when I’m working with preschool children, primary school children, secondary, tertiary students, and working with teachers. If you haven’t established a relationship with people, it’s very difficult for them to trust you. It’s very difficult for them to let you know they’re having issues with their learning or with things affecting their learning. To be honest, it makes my job inauthentic if I haven’t made that connection with them. So, that’s the first part of the equation. Then building on top of that, you need good pedagogical content knowledge. You need to know your discipline. In my case, that’s mathematics education. It’s all well and good getting along with people, but that’s not your core job. That allows you to do your core job, which is helping them learn. In my case, I’m working with two different sets of people. One, the people who are going to become primary school teachers one day, and that brings its own set of rewards and challenges. Then the other thing is an Australia-wide project I’m working on with preschool children, STEM. But regardless of whether it’s the adults or whether it’s the young children and their educators, you need better relationship-building and you need that content. Then on top of that, as an educator I need to be reflective about my practice, to evaluate my own teaching, to evaluate the student learning, and then make changes to future iterations. That’s the thing that happens on the fly. As you’re working with people, you’ll see quickly their body language. Something’s not going the way you wanted it to go, and so there’s the ability to be able to pivot at that point. But then other times it might be when you’re walking along the beach or something and you think about what’s been happening in the course or what’s been happening in the project and you make changes then. So, they’ve always been part of my teaching. The big part that’s changed for me now that I work at the university – I’ve had 30 years in primary education, as a primary school teacher and then leadership positions – is that I also base all of those things I’ve always intuitively done, almost, on research. I’m involved in a lot of research around how to teach undergraduates maths education, research around attitudes towards mathematics for primary school children, research around the role of When I’m working with people and I’m helping them to learn, I get a real buzz out of it. digital technologies. That’s a big part of what I do in maths education. Then that last little bit, the digital technologies, has led to my work on the Elsa Project, which is embedding digital technologies to inspire young children’s interest and engagement instead. That’s really exciting me. I still get excited about working with the adults. So they’re the four elements that go together in my teaching approach. Those are all principles that I think most, if not all, teachers strive to uphold. Do you think that you just do all of them exceptionally, or are you doing something different? That’s a hard question to answer. It’s part of the reason why I’ve been having a bit of trouble getting my head around things. I’m just doing my job. Maybe what’s different, and I don’t want to talk for anyone else, but for me, teaching is a 25