Campus Review Vol 29. Issue 11 | November 2019 | страница 13

campusreview.com.au Code red Education minister says Australian universities are at the heart of ‘unprecedented’ foreign interference. By Wade Zaglas L ucrative research partnerships between Australian universities and China are not only endangering academic autonomy but also presenting a threat to our national security, according to a policy analyst interviewed on ABC TV’s Four Corners program. “It’s clearly not in Australia’s interest to be recklessly training scientists who will go on to develop technologies that could be used against our military and against our county,” said Alex Joske, an analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. Concerns over university infiltration reached a fever pitch early this year when an ANU staff member opened an email and triggered a sophisticated phishing attack that accessed thousands of former students’ information. The program mentioned that “behind closed doors” intelligence officers believed the culprit to be China, although the former head of the Australian Cyber Security Centre, Alastair MacGibbon, said such allegations are yet to be proven. But senior Australian security officials allegedly told Four Corners “they believe the Chinese government was carrying out a high‑tech espionage operation to collect information to comprise and blackmail the victims of the data breach”. Joske believes ANU was targeted because it trains thousands of individuals who will eventually work in the national security community. If ANU holds information that compromises these people, “then this is incredibly concerning and could undermine our national security”, he said. The program highlighted that there have been 30 collaborations between ANU and Chinese defence universities, including research projects to produce aerial robots, drones and technology to “help stealth fighters hide themselves while communicating with military bases”. However, ANU vice-chancellor Brian Schmidt argued that all of the research projects were in the “public domain” and consideration was always given to the potential harm of the project, and that some were for “dual purpose”. “Foreign interference is now at unprecedented levels in this country,” Education Minister Dan Tehan told the program. international education “There have been cyber intrusions which have occurred in the last 3–4 years which should be a wake-up call to Australia, a wake- up call to our university sector, a wake-up call to our business sector, a wake‑up call to our government.” Due to the wealth of information universities hold, Tehan warned the institutions that they must be particularly diligent in dealing with the threat of foreign interference and insisted that “they understand the level of the threat and what needs to done”. However, the Chinese government and its supporters deny that a threat to national security exists or that foreign interference is occurring. “We’ve noticed ASIO and other intelligence agencies in Australia making allegations either direct or indirect against China. We think these allegations are unfounded and without substantial evidence,” said Professor Chen Hong, director of Australian studies at East China Normal University. Later he told a delegation that “in Australia there are some anti-China forces at play”. In addition to allegations of foreign interference at Australian universities, Four Corners also highlighted how Chinese students are being “caught in the middle” of China’s expansionist and nationalistic policies. In August, pro-Beijing supporters clashed violently with pro- democracy protesters. On the same weekend, a pro-China rally was held, with protestors yelling: “If you don’t love China, you are the enemy,” and “If you don’t like Hong Kong, get the hell out of there.” An ugly brawl at the University of Queensland in July occurred during a protest aimed at China’s alleged human rights abuses, and the university’s chancellor Professor Peter Høj’s alleged connections with China and the Chinese Communist party. The Four Corners program also questioned the raison d’être of the 13 Confucius Institutes in Australia. According to Ross Babbage, the senior security adviser for the Australian government, the Anything related to China has been labelled a threat. It’s no longer yellow peril – it’s red peril. institutes are little more than “a mechanism for Communist party apparatchiks … to get into foreign countries”. Babbage also says they are used to “propagate messages from Beijing – propaganda if you like”. Thirdly, they are also used to “keep an eye on ethnic Chinese”. The NSW Department of Education recently announced it would close its Confucius Institutes, citing a “perception of influence from Beijing”. “I deplore very much the decision made by the NSW government [regarding the Confucius Institute closures],” Hong said. “I think it is very much like a witch hunt. Anything related to China has been labelled a threat. it’s no longer yellow peril – it’s red peril.” The National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) is deeply concerned by the allegations made in the program and has called on all universities to review the conditions underlining partnerships with research sponsors and external partners. One of the key concerns expressed by the NTEU was the potential for Australian universities to be contributing to research that is ultimately being used to abuse human rights, the kind that is allegedly happening to the Uyghur population in Xinjiang province through “tech-enhanced surveillance” developed through a research partnership between Australia and China. ■ 11