Campus Review Vol 29. Issue 11 | November 2019 | Page 10

FACULTY FOCUS campusreview.com.au Keeping the best WSU dean of education discusses the reasons behind teaching graduate burnout and what can be done about it. Michele Simons interviewed by Kate Prendergast A lmost half of teaching graduates leave the workforce within five years of entering it. The push factors are complex, often context-specific and interlocking. But understanding and addressing the major reasons behind teacher attrition is vital to high-quality education, governments, schools, parents and the graduates themselves. In essence, the entire schooling ecosystem. Attracting and Keeping the Best Teachers presents an in-depth understanding of the problem, as well as ways in which we can disrupt traditional thinking around career pathways, abolish damaging myths and prejudices, and rewire the system. The book is co-edited by Anna Sullivan, Bruce Johnson and Michele Simons, who are also contributing writers. Simons, dean of education at Western Sydney University, spoke with Campus Review about the book and the issues it grapples with. CR: Up to 50 per cent of new graduates leave teaching within five years of entry. What are the consequences for schools, universities and individuals? MS: In the first instance, schools, and education systems more broadly, are faced with the need to divert increased resources into recruitment and induction to fill the vacancies caused by this attrition. They must also deal with the consequences of losing 8 the expertise of these graduates and the risk of undertaking subsequent recruitment processes which offer no guarantees of being able to fully replace the expertise they have lost. This is particularly the case in a context where the supply of teachers is coming under increasing pressure. There are effectively fewer teachers around to fill increasing numbers of vacancies for all types of employment – casual, contract and permanent. Existing shortages of teachers in specific subject areas such as maths, technology and applied science, as well as teachers willing to be placed in regional and remote schools, are exacerbated. There are significant costs to the teachers – social, emotional as well as economic losses. There is the dislocation that occurs when teachers need to move home as a result of losing their employment. There is also the coming to terms with the realisation that personal and career aspirations are shattered as a consequence of the decision to leave the profession. Perhaps of greatest importance is the impact this attrition can have to the learning of students. Learning is built on relationships, and it’s compromised when students are constantly asked to build relationships with new teachers or adjust to learning in different class groupings as they are shifted into combined year level classrooms to ensure they have a teacher to support their learning. One of the ideas underpinning the book is that it’s damaging to think of early career teachers as ‘liabilities’ or ‘problems to be fixed’. Why is this a push factor? When new graduates are constantly faced with negative messages about their perceived capabilities from the media and other sources – including from inside the profession they have just joined – motivation and enthusiasm can quickly drain away. The graduates often feel like the skills and knowledge they accumulated during their studies are being dismissed and are of little value. This is a harsh reality to live with, given that completing a teacher education program is now arguably harder than ever. Instead of celebrating achievements and the new knowledge, energy and expertise that these new graduates bring, what is emphasised is what they cannot do. This is not a good way to build confidence or ease the transition of new graduates into the profession. Another reason this set of circumstances can weigh heavily on early career teachers is that they know they make up only a small fraction of the overall teaching workforce. If we are to ensure that all children have an experience of school that works for them, we need to ensure that all teachers – regardless of their career stage – are supported to be as effective as they can be. The overemphasis on early career teachers can act to mask sometimes deeper issues which need to be addressed – such as dealing with mid-career burnout or a reward system that encourages the brightest and best to leave the classroom if they want to advance their careers. What are some of the other reasons people are choosing to leave the profession? A recent review of attrition suggests that for some teachers, the decision to leave the profession is a positive one. Their career in teaching is one of a number of occupations that they will fill over their working lives. That said, there is also evidence to suggest that teachers, and sometimes good teachers, choose to leave for a variety of reasons that are not so positive. Research shows that for some teachers the lack of certainty around their employment – constantly being employed casually or on short term contracts is a reason. It’s hard to plan a life when there is no certainty of employment. Other reasons include the frustration, disillusionment and burnout that teachers experience as they are challenged to cope with increased demands such as administrative tasks, managing the learning of increasingly diverse groups of students, and feeling, if not actually having, their work increasingly scrutinised. We haven’t always perceived new teachers so poorly. What’s behind this shift? I think that we are living in a time when there