Cakrawala Edisi 419 | Page 38

OPINI 38 (or in a place outside the jurisdiction of any state)…and directed against the crew or passengers or property onboard another ship..” Thus acts must be committed for economic objectives, involve two vessels and occur in international waters. Graham Ong’s argument that ‘motive’ can be open to interpretation and can be political was raised by Czechoslovakia in the preceding debate over the 1958 Geneva Convention of the High Seas, when it voiced concern that acts of maritime terrorism were not included in the UNCLOS definition. UNCLOS definition of piracy is narrower in scope than previous customary law definitions. Analysts believe this is due to Southeast Asian states’ primary concern of interference of maritime trade and economic aspects of piracy as well as reflecting an unwillingness for states to exercise jurisdiction over politically motivated acts with no economic consequence. Interference in states’ sovereignty or territory issues further limits UNCLOS. Nevertheless, UNCLOS was adopted and it soon became clear it did not cover violent crimes at sea making prosecution difficult. The 1985 hijacking and attack on the passenger liner “Achille Lauro” is an example. Attempts to address this issue through the UN’s International Maritime Organisation, (IMO) resulted in the promulgation of the Rome Convention in 1985. The Rome Convention attempted to develop a legal basis for prosecution of maritime violence not covered by UNCLOS by inclusion of “...seizure or taking control of a vessel by force or threat of force, to perform an act of violence Y