Briefing Papers Number 9, July 2010 | Page 7

PEPFAR effectively has “two heads” in Haiti using extra staff time to little effect. The report found USAID’s country strategy sharply focused and clear but limited in impact, consisting largely of a sprinkling of uncoordinated projects. Such examples showed the need for better planning even before the earthquake. Now, Haiti’s challenges require unprecedented levels of coordination and flexibility, both among donors and within the U.S. effort. USAID should continue to lead the U.S. response—but it will need expanded authority, a more clearly-defined role, and sufficient financial resources. Haiti has suffered the largest urban disaster in modern times. U.S. agencies need more flexibility to respond since earmarks and regulatory requirements often prevent rapid response to changing needs. Aid reform efforts—which include broadening the base of partner organizations within countries and allocating resources to local institutions—are already underway at USAID. More flexibility in procurement and contracting could expand access to business opportunities for Haitians and people in the Haitian diaspora—placing more of the reconstruction in Haitian hands and harnessing the skills and resources of those living abroad. In the long run, a strong partnership with the Haitian people will require a stronger USAID, with more technical expertise and in-country staff, particularly in agriculture. Development professionals empowered to be innovative, resourceful, and focused on results should execute the U.S. strategy for Haiti. not emerge overnight. We will need to think in years, not months, to measure the effectiveness of post-earthquake aid. But our work in Haiti should ultimately result in concrete, measurable, and sustainable improvements for its people. Endnotes 1 As of July 2010, the USG, including USAID, Department of Defense and State Department, has contributed nearly $1.2 billion in earthquake response funding for Haiti. USAID/OFDA, Haiti Earthquake, Fact Sheet #61, FY21010, July 2, 2010. 2 RNDDH Report, May 12; Jesuit Refugee Services (website) 3 ICG Report: http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/latin-americacaribbean/haiti/032-haiti-stabilisation-and-reconstruction-after-the-quake. aspx 4 Haiti Reconstruction Fund website: http://www.haitireconstructionfund.org/hrf/governance 5 Isenman, Paul and Shakow, Alexander, “Donor Schizophrenia an d Aid Effectiveness: The Role of Global Funds”, Institute of Development Studies, Practice Paper, Volume 2010 Number 5. 6 “Empty Promises: Gender Scorecard of World Bank-Managed Post-Tsunami Reconstruction in Indonesia”, Gender Action. Available from: http://www.genderaction.org/images/GAGenderAnalysisMDF-Tsunami.pdf 7 Refugees International, March 2010 Report: http://refugeesinternational. org/policy/field-report/haiti-ground 8 Jesuit Refugee Services: http://www.jrsusa.org/news/news_100302.php/ 9 Refugees International, March 2010 Report: http://refugeesinternational. org/policy/field-report/haiti-ground 10 “Why foreign aid to Haiti failed”, National Academy of Public Administration. Available from: http://www.napawash.org/haiti_final.pdf 11 See “Haiti Reconstruction Platform” website: http://www.refondation.ht/ index.jsp?&lng=en 12 Conclusion: Where Does Haiti Fit in a U.S. Development Strategy? As efforts continue to rebuild Haiti, U.S. foreign assistance is undergoing one of the most extensive reviews in decades. The results should point to a new model for foreign assistance—part of a larger strategy to reframe U.S. aid efforts and priorities—whose central themes include country ownership, interagency coordination, evaluation, and accountability for results. If we are serious about long-term engagement in Haiti, the findings of the review should inform planning and programs on the ground. The whole point is to harness the considerable energy that still exists to make U.S. aid more effective in building a better Haiti. A focus on meaningful civil society participation, robust transparency, institutional capacity-building, and long-term development will bring greater returns on our investment. Haiti is perhaps the toughest case, but also a worthy place to test the U.S. political will to move toward meaningful partnerships. A truly country-led development process will www.bread.org “Using Food Aid to Support, Not Harm, Haitian Agriculture”, CEPR: http://www.cepr.net/index.php/relief-and-reconstruction-watch/using-food-aidto-support-not-harm-haitian-agriculture/ 13 “Haiti Relief Effort Needs Immediate Ramp-up to Avoid Disaster”. Available from: http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/relief-and-reconstruction-watch/ 14 Peace Dividend Trust, “Haiti First Policy” proposal: http://www. peacedividendtrust.org/en/?sv=&category=What%20We%20Do~PDM%20 Haiti&title=Haiti%20First 15 Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative Consultation Document, September 28, 2009. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/ organization/130164.pdf 16 World Food Programme: http://www.wfp.org/countries/haiti 17 The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrollment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income). For the full report see: http://hdrstats.undp.org/ en/countries/country_fact_sheets/cty_fs_HTI.html. See also Transparency International’s 2009 Corruption Perception Index: http://www.transparency. org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009/cpi_2009_table 18 World Food Programme: http://www.wfp.org/countries/haiti 19 http://www.usaid.gov/press/speeches/2010/sp100505_1.html 20 Save the Children, Modernizing Foreign Assistance—Insights from the Field: Haiti, October 2009. Bread for the World Institute  7