Briefing Papers Number 19, July 2012 | Página 7

processes and action steps to foster improved collaboration and coordination of nutrition policies and programs. Currently, accountability for nutrition outcomes is also spread across the government. In the absence of a whole of government nutrition strategy, there are only ad hoc coordination mechanisms, making it difficult to document the impact of U.S. investments in nutrition and to ensure coordination. Each SUN country has appointed a high-level focal point for nutrition.48 This is a senior-level position, usually in the prime minister’s or president’s office, that has the authority to bring together finance, agriculture, health, and social protection ministries in order to implement national nutrition strategies. This is a model that the U.S. government should also consider, particularly given the crosscutting, multi-sectoral nature of nutrition as an issue and the fragmentation and complexity of U.S. global nutrition programs. The creation of a high-level Nutrition Focal Point, housed within the USAID Administrator’s office and granted the authority to develop, direct, and implement a whole of government global nutrition strategy across multiple agencies, would improve accountability for tracking progress against set objectives and targets. The administration could also consider creating a nutrition technical advisory board composed of civil society and academic experts to help inform and provide feedback on the U.S. government strategy and implementation. Ideally, this high-level position would be supported by a Nutrition Point Person, senior and mid-level managers within each corresponding agency, bureau, or office (e.g., at BFS, USAID/FFP, USAID/NUT, USAID/OHA, and OGAC, USDA) who focus on building partnerships and improving policies and programs. These Nutrition Point Persons would promote interagency planning, coordination, and management efforts. They would not assume the responsibilities of Agreement Officer Representatives (AOR) and Contract Officer Representatives (COR);49 rather, they would focus on implementing and operationalizing an interagency nutrition strategy. Nutrition Point Persons would complement the growing number of nutrition technical advisors50 within existing agencies, bureaus, and offices. This structure would provide both managerial/ operational and technical organizational support for nutrition in GHI, FTF, and other countries with U.S.funded nutrition programming. It would ensure that a single coordinated nutrition strategy aligns with and supports country priorities, including country- and community-led nutrition goals. The high-level nutrition focal point and supporting nutrition point people would harmonize U.S. government efforts for nutrition and ensure that staff members in the field receive accurate, upto-date guidance to manage their nutrition portfolios. This www.bread.org structure would also encourage stronger documentation of important evidence-based results from the field and would support the creation of a common knowledge platform and best practices for nutrition. Recommendations • Appoint a high-level Nutrition Focal Point at USAID to implement a whole of government nutrition strategy, lead interagency nutrition efforts, be accountable for results, and facilitate improved coordination among agencies, bureaus, and offices. • Map out and assess lines of authority, roles, and responsibilities for coordinating, planning, and managing nutrition programs at headquarters and in the field. Make necessary recommendations for improvement, which should include increased staffing levels as well as more coordinated efforts. • Appoint Nutrition Point Persons within relevant bureaus, )