Briefing Papers Number 18, June 2012 | Page 14

Andrew Wainer Conclusion The United States has multiple development programs in the Northern Triangle: Honduras and El Salvador received Millennium Challenge Compacts—both expected to be renewed in 2012—while Guatemala and Honduras are two of the 20 Feed the Future focus countries, the U.S. government’s primary global food security program (see Table 11 on next page). In November 2011, it was also announced that El Salvador would be one of only four nations worldwide to participate in the State Department’s Partnership for Growth, intended to “accelerate and sustain broad-based economic growth.”67 No major U.S. deThis small farmer in the high-migration department of Morazán in El Salvador is working with the Millennium velopment program explicitly Challenge Corporation to increase his agricultural production through improved irrigation and other techniques. includes migration measures in these high-intensity unauthorized migration nations. an official part of the compact, the MCC’s work with small and medium farmers has effectively provided opportunity to This is a missed opportunity that incurs costs to migrants, deportees who return to the regions where the MCC is work- their families left behind, and the effectiveness of U.S. iming. Oscar Armando González lived in the United States for migration policy. The economic causes of migration could be explicitly ad10 years before he was deported back to El Salvador in 2010. “The first months you feel sad because there you earned dressed by host governments, development agencies, and more and you could help your family [with remittances],” multilateral institutions. Migration variables could be explicitly measured and integrated into development programGonzález said. But through a farmers’ association working ming in the region. Migration from Central America to with the MCC in the northeastern department of Morazán, the United States will continue, but ideally it will become González is settling back into a life growing tomatoes, cua choice conducted through legal means that are more efficumbers, and chiles. cient, humane, and beneficial to migrants, the host country, Although he misses the wages he was making in the Unit- and the countries of origin. As Enrique Merlos of FUNDE ed States and his ability to send money back home, González said, “We want people who go abroad to do so because they has found that there are advantages he didn’t possess as an want to, not because they have to.” unauthorized immigrant in the United States: proximity to his children and parents, and the ease with which he can live and work in El Salvador. “You have fun working here,” Recommendations González said. “There when you don’t have papers at any Remittances moment they can knock on your door looking for you.” His Measurement and Evaluation: In nations with migration siblings in the United States are still sending money, and levels as intensive as the Northern Triangle, U.S. development González said he is using some of it to make his plot of land programs should include migration propensity as a specific more productive using the irrigation techniques he learned variable they measure. The Inter-American Foundation through the MCC. González said that he now doesn’t want is a leader among U.S. development agencies in making to go back to the United States. “I’ve adapted to working the connections between migration and development in countries of origin. The MCC and USAID could incorporate here,” he said. “We are going to try to start a new life.” 14  Briefing Paper, June 2012