BrandKnew September 2013 January 2013 | Page 33

32 This is where science comes into play. In our case, we rely on our celebrity index – the Celebrity DBI – to provide us with data to guide our decisions. The DBI quantifies consumer perceptions of more than 2,500 celebrities, scoring them across a number of key attributes, including Awareness, Appeal, Trust, Influence, Aspiration, Trendsetter, Endorsement, and Breakthrough (the degree to which consumers take notice of a celebrity). Awareness is the baseline. If our target doesn’t know a celebrity, the other attributes are meaningless. Breakthrough is also an important attribute. If the celebrity doesn’t capture the attention of the consumer, the brand’s message is less likely to be received. Influence is an equally significant attribute for brands. How does this celebrity impact brand consideration and purchase intent? The importance of other attributes varies depending on the brand. A bank, for example, might be more interested in celebrities who score high in trust, while a fashion brand or even an energy drink may value celebs who are regarded as trendsetters. Supporting this analysis, we segment our process into six factors or vertices, which we envision as a hexagon, assigning a score to each. Serving as a roadmap to guide our thinking, this process enhances endorser identification, resulting in maximization of engagement between the brand, the targeted consumer, and the celebrity. Combining scores from each of the following six vertices determines a celebrity’s overall fit in driving consumer engagement and brand objectives. Not all of the six vertices of this hexagon are equal, however. Some, like cost and creative fit, carry more weight. 1. Talent Synchronicity One of the most interesting challenges of our business lies in discovering which celebrity best fits the unique personality of a brand. Imagine a triangle, with the brand, the consumer and the product each sitting in one of the three corners. The challenge is finding the celebrity who fits best with all three of these variables. Some celebs will fit better with the brand; others match up more evenly with the product itself; and still others are ideal for the consumer. The goal is to land in the centre of the equilateral triangle (Figure 1). When we do – when we hit the midpoint of that target – we’ve achieved talent synchronicity. Of course, when additional filters are layered on top of this triangle – target demographics and psychographics; image congruency or the linkage between the brand and celebrity; the extent to which the celebrity engages the target – it becomes increasingly difficult to hit the bull’s eye using guesswork and conjecture. Considering the investment, it’s important to tilt the odds in our favour. 2. Cost Figure 1 Costs vary depending on talent level (A-level, B-level, C-level), rights, services, term, territory, exclusivity and brand creative. Will the celebrity appear on camera? Is this a global campaign? Voiceover only? Will the brand use the celeb’s likeness (e.g. Elvis Presley)? Are we licensing a song? Is the creative compelling? Depending on the situation, celebrity costs can range from the low five figures to eight figures. In addition to talent fees, factor in union fees (if applicable), production fees, including first-class travel or even a private plane, along with other accommodations and other ancillary marketing costs, and you can see how the fees escalate quite rapidly. We typically identify anywhere from a few to 100 celebrities for a particular project or campaign, before filtering down to ten or so, and then ranking them in talent synchronicity from 1-10. If Celebrity #1 costs $1 million and Celebrity #2 requires $500,000, who do you sign? If you’ve been disciplined in your approach, removing as much subjectivity as possible, the answer should be more clear, but there may be a struggle between the poet and the scientist, which is also part of the process. 3. Creative Fit In some cases, the brand or its agency has already developed (and received approval from the client on) creative. Based on the existing creative, which celebrity fits best? Are there specific personality characteristics, attributes, or skillsets that the celebrity must possess in order to be a good fit? In other cases, the creative is built around the celebrity. In these cases, it’s important to develop creative that suits the celebrity naturally and puts the celebrity in a position to deliver the brand messaging in a natural way. In some cases, we may decide to allow the talent to have some creative input. Chefs or comedians, for e [\KX^H