BrandKnew September 2013 Feb 2014 | Page 23

brandknewmag.com 22 On March 8, KKR made a $3.74 billion bid for Gardner Denver. In case you haven’t heard of Gardner Denver before, they are the go-to guys when it comes to all kinds of pumps, compressors, blowers, loading arms, and fuel systems. As Mercedes is to cars, Gardner Denver is to pumps. The company is so well regarded in its field, in fact, that its latest annual report calculated 43 percent of its value to be goodwill and other intangible assets. That’s a number any company could feel good about. In fact, by that measure, the Philadelphia company has more value tied up in its brand than Procter & Gamble PG +1.2%, whose goodwill represents about 40 percent of its asset value. And Gardner Denver is not atypical. While B-to-B brands don’t get as much press, they are very valuable and often, as a percentage of assets, more valuable than their betterknown B-to-C cousins. Some analysts estimate that B-to-B brands may be worth well over $100 billion. Brands drive profits Brands of even less well-known companies such as Gardner Denver can be valuable because B-to-B purchases arguably matter more than B-to-C ones: buy the wrong toothpaste, and you can always change brands when the tube runs out. Buy the wrong turbine and you could hurt your company’s earnings for years – and find yourself looking for another job. All this translates into more profit for the B-to-B supplier. B-to-B companies with brands that are perceived as strong generate a higher EBIT margin than others. In 2012, strong brands outperformed weak brands by 20 percent, up from 13 percent in 2011. Decision makers are willing to pay a premium for strong brands because established brands make their lives easier. They aggregate information and reduce risk. Strong supplier brands may even aid companies in building their own reputation by association. Brands have a strong influence on purchase decisions Business marketers have traditionally believed that the key to differentiation in a B-to-B market is to provide service, availability, pricing, and quality. Obviously, these things matter. But in our 2012 study in which we surveyed more than 700 executives with substantial influence on supplier selection in the United States, Germany, and India, we found that as with consumers, business buyers’ purchase decisions tend to be a lot less value-driven than they like to think. Like consumers, professional buyers use the vendor’s reputation as a short cut that reduces risk and simplifies the evaluation process. In fact, our survey found that B-to-B purchasing decision makers consider the brand as a central rather than a marginal element of a supplier’s value proposition. Our survey found that decisio