BISWAS Nov 1 Issue 18 | Page 47

Claims that vaccines “undergo rigorous and extensive testing”, that they are “held to the highest standard of safety”, etc., are lies. The sad truth is exactly the opposite.

The studies that are the bases for marketing authorizations are a complete and utter methodological mess. They are designed so very badly that they do not allow the detection and evaluation of short-term, let alone long-term vaccination effects. Such methodologically so inadequate studies should never be part of the process of granting marketing authorizations. I have to emphasize here that the mass utilization of untested vaccines, i.e. vaccines that haven’t been reliably tested, isn’t rare. On the contrary, granting a marketing authorization to vaccines without methodologically sound studies of safety and efficacy is a rule, not an exception.

Preclinical safety studies are often not done

Pharmacokinetic studies are not required for vaccines

Observation periods are extremely short – often only 5-15 days after each dose

Placebos are practically never used (they often use other vaccines)

Since there is not placebo, there is no true control group

Side-effects are literally “observed,” with no blood testing, no neurological exams, or any other exams.

Majority of clinical trials are financed by the producers

Study reports are often too incomplete

Only healthy people are included in trials

The “vaccine” is declared “effective” on the basis of being able to induce the production of antibodies, but this end point does not equal protection, immunity, and efficacy.

The ongoing COVID injection trial is not providing people with informed consent. It’s all a diabolical, mass experiment that corrupt public ‘authorities’ state is “safe and effective,” despite evidence to the contrary

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/08/vaccine-safety-efficacy-studies-that-are-the-bases-for-marketing-authorizations-are-a-complete-methodological-mess/