You call your method
as the ever-green
revolution? Is
the second green
revolution possible?
When the first green
revolution happened,
we had a different
population. As compared
to that, we have a different
scenario now. And while
the demand increases,
the supply isn’t getting
bigger. Hence, the gap is
becoming broader. We
are trying to fill it by our
process. We are calling it
evergreen revolution.
Can this process
replace the need for
GM crops entirely?
What are your views
on GM crops?
In the case of GM crops,
we don’t know about
the long-term impact.
That is why people are
concerned. Comparatively
this method that has
been tested on wheat
and we must try on
rice and maize. Is more
superior on them. There
is no environmental or
health concerns.
In case of GM crops, we
are increasing the size
The new technology, if successful on the
field, can be a respite for India where wheat
production took a hit in 2015 and 2016 due
to widespread drought and imports surged to
the highest seen in a decade. India is likely to
harvest a record 96.6 million tonnes beginning
April this year, but a warmer winter may shave
off some of the gains of a normal monsoon
last year.
of grain, that not only
includes starch but the
protein as well. In GM
crops, protein content
gets drastically changed.
And protein is a very
useful molecule as well as
notorious too.
While in GM, we cut the
codon that are thought
to be unimportant. Then
protein synthesis happens
after insertion. After
deletion, the protein
produced may not be safe
due to the.
All GM crops are bad?
In Bangladesh nobody
died after eating GM?
I feel in case of edible
crops, they are going to
affect human health. Bt
cotton was ok only in the
non-edible form. Even
the oil produced from
it can’t be called safe.
These GM crops don’t
show impact in 2-3
years. Sometimes they
may slow effect after 25
years. Other concerns are
related to environment
as the cross pollination
with other varieties of
the same plant are a big
issue here. There will
be only a single race
eventually and that goes
against nature.
But modifications
happen in nature too?
The one you are talking
about is slow. It is the
natural selection based
on many factors. It is
not controlled. But GM
is just the opposite as
it is sudden and done
using tools.
BIOVOICENEWS.COM
57