Bass Fishing Jun - Jul 2020 | Page 55

healthier and more robust than its buddies, which cascaded into better fitness, better nest success and perhaps a more fit brood, which over time became predisposed to consuming gobies. After several generations, those bass that were more likely to eat gobies became more abundant and successful than those that weren’t, and thus the population evolved to where we are today – with the round goby as a predominant forage species for smallmouth bass anywhere they coexist. Other examples of direct learning include the opposite end of the spectrum, whereby an animal learns to avoid something due to a negative or PHOTO BY ROB MATSUURA dangerous experience. Consider the way bass use shade as a form of cover. It’s easy to imagine that at some point there was a bass sitting out in the open, and it was attacked by an osprey, eagle, heron or some other threat from above. It survived, but it learned that shade was a much safer environment. This is an oversimplification, for sure, as evolution is an extremely nuanced topic, but it demonstrates that all animals, including bass, have the ability to learn from direct interactions with their environment. SOCIAL LEARNING A different type of learning frequently studied by biologists is the concept of social learning, or learning not just from direct experience, but rather from observing and interacting with other members of the same or other species. For more socially involved animals, this happens all the time. Studies of the lined bristletooth, a saltwater reef fish, showed that individuals on reefs more frequently targeted by spear fishing anglers – where they witnessed other lined birstletooth being hunted – were quicker to flee than those individuals that lived on reefs and weren’t, and the response was even quicker when the individual diver was actually holding a spear gun. These results support the idea that not only were lined bristletooth able to learn from watching their fellows be hunted, but also that they would react differently to a diver depending on whether or not he or she was holding a spear gun. Another example of social learning in fishes was a 2007 study in which juvenile Japanese flounder that had observed other flounder being consumed by predators showed a better ability to avoid predation than naïve juveniles that hadn’t interacted with the predators. This showed that not only could these flounder learn socially, but also that they were able to funnel at least some of what they learned into behavioral changes. As interesting as these studies are, the questions remain: Does this happen with bass? And how can I use this information to catch more fish? BASS LEARNING In 2019, researchers from the University of Illinois published a paper that for the first time reported on a comprehensive study on bass’ ability and propensity for both direct and social learning. Unsurprisingly to many seasoned anglers, they found that bass do indeed learn from being caught. Perhaps surprisingly, though, the results also showed that bass don’t seem to have the ability to learn socially. Observing other bass being caught, as well as the presence of “learned” bass, didn’t alter the behavior of naïve individuals (that hadn’t been caught). To set up the study, researchers stocked bass into four ponds, and then anglers fished two of them with wacky-rigged stick baits. This gave the bass in the two fished ponds “experience,” and as the bass were caught, catch rates decreased as expected. The bass were “learning” to avoid the lure. Once this had occurred, the researchers then stocked some of the naïve bass from the two unfished ponds into the ponds with educated bass that hadn’t been caught and fished again, this time with a series of different baits: two plastics (the green original one again as well as a white version) and an in-line spinner. These naïve bass showed no difference in catch rates or response times relative to the educated bass. In other words, they weren’t “learning” from the educated bass. Similarly, catch rates declined as the bass “learned,” until a new lure was introduced. Then catch rates again temporarily spiked. These results should be interesting to anglers for several reasons, most importantly because they address the age-old concept that as fisheries mature, the bass in them become educated to certain lures. This study helps illustrate that it’s probably not the result of bass learning from the mistakes of their compatriots – like an older generation of bass that previously was exposed to certain lures. Certainly, angler pressure has been shown in countless studies to reduce catch rates, but science would argue that’s mostly from direct learning. The idea that another bass watching its buddy get caught can learn to avoid your lure is directly disputed by these results. JUNE-JULY 2020 | MAJORLEAGUEFISHING.COM | FLWFISHING.COM 53