Bass Fishing Jul 2017 | Page 41

The Rear Careful consideration must be made to the vital equip- ment located in the stern and bilge areas of the boat. For starters, there are the batteries. While many pros continue to experiment with alternatives to traditional systems, noth- ing is more dependable and longer-lasting than wet-cell lead batteries. Anglers new to big water often fail to consider the demand placed on batteries in this style of fishing. In many Great Lakes events, I’ve found it necessary to run my trolling motor – the most powerful 36-volt system available – at 80 to 100 percent continuously, simply to hold my place on struc- ture. Only the biggest, strongest batteries can meet such demands for periods extending six to eight hours. I suggest 31-series deep-cycle batteries. They should be tightly secured within the bilge area. Avoid placing batteries on center trays intended for spare props, or other areas where they might interfere with access to the lower recesses of the bilge. In the event of a busted hose or inoperable livewell pump, moving a 60-pound battery out of the way to access the area is anything but convenient in 4-foot waves. Batteries are only as good as the charger that maintains them. It’s essential to have a charger that compensates for power surges, temperature fluctuations and different battery types. Select one with a minimum of 10 amps per bank, though 15 is better. And make absolutely certain that the charger and all components beneath deck are absolutely waterproof, as this area of the boat stays wet nearly constantly in big water. TESTING G-FORCE IN ROUGH WATER Through the years, I’ve worked closely with engineers at Johnson Outdoors to increase the durabili- ty of products coming to the bass market. With Lake Erie as a testing ground, one particular research project involved sensitive scientific probes to test the amount of G-force experienced on my Ranger Z520 while boating in rough water. Each day that I ventured out on Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair, I kept a detailed log of weather and wave conditions, as well as any other relevant factors. Sensors kept track of impact forces in a dozen places throughout the boat, with the data all contained in a massive onboard hard drive that was then downloaded by engineers at the conclusion of the project. The results were stunning. For instance, at times, the trolling motor mount experienced accel- eration of more than 14 Gs dur- ing wave impact. That’s two to three times the acceleration of the wildest roller coasters, or a Formula 1 car in a sharp turn. Using a scientific formula, this equates to the trolling motor (at about 60 pounds) exerting about 840 pounds of force on the bow of the boat. Conversely, sensors placed in the rear of the boat on the battery charger and jack plate saw much less acceleration – rarely above 1 G. The moral of the story: Never skimp on rigging procedures in the bow. ■ JULY 2017 I FLWFISHING.COM FALCONRODS.COM 39