Banker S.A. September 2012 | Page 19

Panel 1 Nichola Dewar, CFO of SA Postbank; Anton de Wet, Managing Executive of Client Engagements at Nedbank; Ayanda Mjekula, Acting CEO at Ubank Ltd. PHOTOGRAPHS SUPPLIED ‘…when correctly applied and adequately complied with, prudential regulation should enhance financial inclusion.’ continued their lending activities in general, including financing BEE transactions worth over R80 billion since 2007. According to the FinScope Small Business Survey (2002), only 39% of the adult South African population had access to basic financial services in 2002. Even while complying with the more rigorous requirements of Basel II since its adoption in 2008, the number of adult South Africans with access to banking services increased to 63% in 2011. South African banks extended over R175 billion for low-cost housing, developmental infrastructure, SMEs and black agriculture from 2004 right through the peak of the international crises up until 2010. It is only in South Africa that during times of worldwide financial circumspection, talk of asset bubbles developing in the banking system finds currency. With unsecured loans increasing at a rapid rate since 2009 to over R50 billion today, some have warned that this may lead to systemic instability, while others argue that it could result in the abuse of clients by leading them to unsustainable levels of over-indebtedness. Nevertheless, the problems South Africans face are not a lack of lending, or impairment to financial inclusion. The problem is the oversupply of credit to low-income people. This coming from a fairly healthy South African banking system. Financial inclusion in South Africa did not improve despite a rigorous prudential framework; it improved because of it. South African banks are healthy because they had to operate under a strict prudential framework. We need only look at the events unfolding across the Atlantic to see the effects of a lax prudential framework to lending when it is needed the most. Therefore Basel III should not be the impediment to BEE finance that it is made out to be. Basel III should indeed enhance financial inclusion and BEE finance. Empirical evidence in South Africa disproves the notion of a negative causal relationship between prudent financial regulation and financial inclusion. Evidence shows the opposite to be true. Panel 2 Lowell Campbell, Head of Agent Banking for Africa at Standard Bank; Eric Silke, UNCDF. Panel 3 Gerry Anderson , COO and Acting Deputy Executive Officer: Market Conduct & Consumer Education at FSB; Ingrid Goodspeed, Chief Director: Financial Sector Development for National Treasury; Olaotse Mantshane, Managing Director of Cooperative Banks Development Agency (CBDA). Nkosana Mashiya is the Deputy Registrar of Banks: Banks Supervision Department, SARB. Edition 3 THE BANKER 17