Banker S.A. January 2015 - Edition 12 . | Page 49

TECHNOLOGY Why reliability rests on innovative banking systems Outdated technology is causing banks to lose valuable ‘online time’. The solution lies in keeping up with current global trends. By Xolisa Vuza Xolisa Vuza T he South African banking industry has suffered a spate of technical failures recently – the worst of which resulted in a bank being unable to process transactions or connect its channels online. During these lapses, customers have either been unable to receive their deposited salaries on time and ensure debit orders are transacted, or they have been unable to log into their accounts to perform transactions and review their account statements. The unmistakable reality is that this leaves many unhappy customers and the risk of reputational damage for the bank. Considering that we are living in an era of ‘always on and always available’, there is a demand for banking systems to be available 24/7 for customers to perform transactions wherever and whenever. What, then, went wrong? The answer lies in legacy. In terms of computing, legacy refers to outdated systems, programming languages or software being used instead of available upgraded versions. What is evident is that most banks still deal with legacy challenges in terms of processes, applications, or even infrastructure. While legacy systems support the bulk of a bank’s processes and can be adapted to ever-changing customer needs, they remain a weak point because they are: • based on old architecture; • not documented well enough; and • limited in terms of deployment because of the associated costs related to running and managing them. One specific example is the great dependency on mainframes. Mainframes have been and still remain reliable processing platforms for banks in terms of speed and trust. A great deal of intellectual property is embedded or built into the mainframes and legacy systems. Yet, in most cases, this intellectual property is undocumented anywhere and has grown into a huge monster that banks struggle with, or find difficult to replace. Legacy systems are also mostly built incrementally, which results in issues either on the application or infrastructure architecture when people who have been involved in such systems move on. Ultimately, this poses a huge risk to businesses that remain on undocumented legacy. While it is normal that systems will go down due to unforeseen circumstances, it is also true that systems go down because of a lack of integrated planning and a lack of understanding the impact of introduced changes over a period of time. There are three key architectural points that banks can look at enforcing in their environments: 1. Setting a direction. It is important for banks to know how their architecture needs to evolve based on trends, strategy and competitor analysis. This will help ensure that the bank focuses on the correct areas of the architecture to remain relevant. Projects that get initiated will also find a reference point as they are part of a migration strategy towards the future architecture, while delivering on immediate requirements. 2. Understanding their architecture. It seems to be human nature not to worry about things until something goes wrong. This leads to a lack of focus in documenting what the architecture looks like (and what it will look like) as a result of project impacts. I have seen instances where deployments are done and something goes wrong, and no one knows what things looked like before deployment. There are many levels where this can be documented. 3. Evolving their architecture. Any architecture should evolve with the times, depending on trends, changing customer patterns and demands, changing technology styles and even new ways of doing things that make sense to adopt. These should always be taken into account when evolving the architecture. Banking has evolved to a state where customers can do all of their banking via mobile or internet banking. Surely it’s time that architecture evolves to a point that it improves reliability and the customers’ needs too? Xolisa Vuza is the Senior Solutions Architect at Ovations Group. Edition 12 | BANKERSA Technology.indd 47 47 2014/12/18 10:16 AM