BAMOS Vol 33 No.2 June 2020 | Page 25

BAMOS Jun 2020 25 Figure 4: Google Earth aerial view of the location of damage indicator 9 (blue marker), along with photographic evidence of the damage inflicted (insets). Figure 5: Google Earth aerial view of the location of damage indicator 10 (blue marker), along with photographic evidence of the damage inflicted (insets). Daniel Hayward from an under‐development housing estate along Boundary Road, Mount Duneed (Figure 5) which was consistent with those presented in the media from the same location. A large amount of debris emanating from house construction sites to the immediate north was strewn throughout the trees and vegetation, including larger and heavier items such as air conditioning units, whitegoods, and fencing. Some debris was evident to have been wrapped around tree branches and trunks. A few trees were snapped at the trunks including those of reasonable girth, along with branches aloft. Based on the Degree of Damage descriptors in Table 3, DOD 4 “trunks snapped” is satisfied suggesting a 3‐second wind gust speed range of 150–216 km/h with an ‘expected’ wind gust speed of 172 km/h. There also appeared to be some evidence of debarking as well as local debarking associated with debris scars which would qualify for DOD 5 “trees debarked with only stubs of largest branches remaining” being partially satisfied and pushing the tornado intensity into the EF2 range. Some of the trees appeared to have smooth textured mottled bark which makes the identification of debarking difficult and reliant upon the comparison between possible debarked trees with debris impact scars and non‐debarked trees. Given these difficulties, the reliance upon secondary information, and only one damage indicator suggesting such intensity, the tornado intensity rating for this damage indicator remained within the upper bounds of the EF1 intensity rating but noting the possibility of extending into the EF2 intensity rating. Consequently, the ‘expected’ wind gust speed for these two damage indicators within, and thus the tornado intensity rating based upon the observed damage being, an EF1 rating from Table 1 with estimated 3‐second wind gust speeds of 138–178 km/h. DOD Damage Description Expected 3‐second Wind Gust Speed (km/h) Lower Bound 3‐second Wind Gust Speed (km/h) Upper Bound 3‐second Wind Gust Speed (km/h) 1 Small limbs broken (up to 2.5 cm diameter) 97 77 116 2 Large branches broken (2.5–7.6 cm diameter) 119 98 142 3 Trees uprooted 151 122 190 4 Trunks snapped 172 150 216 5 Trees debarked with only stubs of largest branches remaining 230 198 269 Table 3: Degree of Damage (DOD) categories and descriptors for the 'Hardwood Trees (TH)' Damage Indicator and associated 3‐second estimated wind gust speeds adapted from McDonald and Mehta (2004) and converted to metric units.