AWB 2022 Legislative Review | Page 24

2022 legislative review
AWB Government Affairs Director Peter Godlewski leads a discussion at Legislative Day & Hill Climb with Rep . Joe Fitzgibbon , D-West Seattle , chair of the House Environment & Energy Committee .
limits on statewide preemption , repeals the state Clean Air Rule and also tasks the Office of Financial Management to create a study on the existing laws that regulate GHGs from stationary sources and the GHG emissions reductions associated with those laws . The study is due to the Legislature by December 2023 . AWB originally opposed the bill but went to support after we secured changes in the House . The bill passed 81-15 in the House and 36-13 in the Senate .
HB 1812 modernizing the energy facility site evaluation council to meet the state ’ s clean energy goals
Passed / AWB Supported
This session marked the fourth year this particular bill has been introduced in one form or another . The bill spins off the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council ( EFSEC ) which is currently part of the UTC , into a separate agency . The bill also allows projects to utilize an accelerated permitting process for certain clean energy manufacturing projects that would , under certain circumstances , be able to have a shortcut through the permitting process .
While AWB has supported bills that provide permitting reform and relief for projects in the past , this bill added several conditions and qualifiers to the expedited process that AWB members did not think went far enough . These included requiring that any project that utilized the expedited process retain EFSEC as the main regulator during operation ( even when another state agency would have more experience ), allowing the head of EFSEC wide latitude in determining which projects met the criteria for utilizing the expedited process , and limiting the new process to only clean energy manufacturing projects instead all possible projects .
AWB initially testified neutral on the bill , speaking in support of the idea of easing permitting for projects while questioning the need for another state agency . As the bill was ready to move off the floor , a deal was struck to allow a Republican amendment which created a study of clean energy siting across the state and their impacts on rural communities if the Republicans would support the bill . AWB was asked to support the bill as part of the final deal to move the bill and the Energy Committee members had little objection to shifting to support . AWB moved to a position of support . The bill passed 92-6 in the House and 29-20 in the Senate .
environment
The issue of extended producer responsibility ( EPR ) remained the top issue for the Environment committee . After last year ’ s paring down of SB 5022 to meet the constraints of a virtual session , the environmental advocates pushing for this policy returned with a newer version of the policy . Advocates held listening sessions over the summer on the draft version of the bill , but were reluctant to make significant changes . As a result , the version of the bill that was introduced was largely opposed by employers and despite some attempts late in the process to make changes , the bill ended up dying . With the subsequent retirement of Sen . Mona Das , D-Kent , the champion of this policy , it is unclear if the issue will be reintroduced in the future .
Another area of activity for this committee related to chemical safety . There was one bill introduced which would have made some sweeping changes to how the Safer Products for Washington Process was managed and another which tried to limit
24 association of washington business