AV News Magazine | Page 44

AV News 187 - February 2012 Flat Copy Stuart Clark The RPS and PAGB assessors and judges comprise very accomplished photographers whose knowledge and skills go beyond taking photographs. For some time they have been engaged in discussions on the use of third party images, usually attributable to illustrations produced by others, whether copyright or not. Over the years quite significant productions have included such work but there is a feeling that when so done, it raises the question of whether this element should be taken into greater consideration when presented for adjudication. Mostly, AV workers are members of photographic societies and clubs, but not all are readers of AV News or even attend AV days, and so may be unfamiliar with the contention related to the predominant use of such illustrations. Digital access newcomer authors advanced from flowers and music to the extravagances of sourcing these contentious materials for documentary productions. However, they will be sensitive to the atmosphere in their clubs of winning entries of stained glass windows being more ascribed to the skills of craftsman than the photographer. In record photography artefacts require much skill, not always evident in the quality and direction of lighting of such subjects, whereas illustrations are merely ‘flat copy’, a term applied to evaluating commercial assignments requiring little input. Now that most are familiar with the complexities of software manipulation, much more is expected of print and projected image workers to emulate the skills in final images of darkroom workers from yesteryear and now extended with the greater use of filters in front of the lens. Suzanne Walker says of her award winning production 'Inspired By The Landscape' few images were straight out of the camera. Only the means to the end is new. The picture of Saltwick Bay on the next page (original below) by David Brain of Normanton Camera Club took most of an afternoon working in Photoshop. The 'Plug in' 'ONONE Phototools 2.6' costing about £60 will do it a little more easily, as will 'Topaz', but 'NIK HDR Pro' will do it with just three clicks - the cost about £100. At the end of it all though the success of any manipulation depends on the ability to visualise the end result. The application of such skills is now expected in the new standards and criteria. Where a production cannot be made without the use of some originals full accreditation is now required, but there seems to be a growing lobby for our adjudicators to be required to discount what may otherwise be a compelling sequence. Page 42