Autumn book autumn book_goomag | Page 62

FW: TOR deep internet Dear Mr Alexander Chernavsky, Thank you for your participation in our competition. I need to inform you that we did not accept one of your images («TOR» – so called «deep Internet») due to that it qualifies as child pornography according to Dutch law. Below please find the analysis from our lawyers and we have handle according to their advice: ...We observed that the person in the picture looks no doubt like a minor. Moreover, it is clear that the image has an unnatural character in a sexual sense. Therefore, this photo qualifies as child pornography as set out in section 240b of the Dutch Penal Code and it is prohibited to display this image in public. Previously – before the latest changes in the legislation – section 240b of the Dutch Penal Code contained exceptions for images which were used for scientific, educational or therapeutic purposes. Nowadays an exception is only made in cases of absence of substantive unlawfulness. This means that the legal standard is better ensured by the violation of the provision than by compliance with the provision. This is a very rare legal exception which does not seem to apply here. An exceptio artis has never been acknowledged in this context. We conclude that the World Press Photo is not allowed to display the contribution of the Russian artist in public. Please note that even the possession of child pornography is illegal. Therefore we advise you to destroy the image as soon as possible.» I hope i informed you sufficiently. Kind regards, Michiel Munneke Managing Director 8.02.201 4