Autosport - 5 March 2015 | Page 67

MANOR GRAND PRIX DUNBAR/LAT XPB IMAGES WorldMags.net EXPERT VIEW Gary Anderson Technical consultant Will Stevens has been named on the entry list But what exactly is the long-term plan? I’m concerned about the creditors, because this team dug itself deeper and deeper into financial trouble, whoever’s fault that was, and this can’t just be a continuation of the same thing. It’s going to be a long, hard season for Manor, if the team makes it to Australia, which is still not certain at the time of writing. XPB IMAGES With what is basically a 2014 car and an out-ofdate specification of the weakest power-unit package of last year, Manor is simply in survival mode. The car will be at the back of the grid in terms of time, so the question is where is the team going? All credit to those involved for making it, but this needs to be about more than just being there to secure the £30 million or so FOM money. It’s degrading for F1 to have put a team in this position given the money the sport is making. Over the years, there have been endless talks but nothing has been done to reduce costs, we’ve already lost the Caterham team and others are in trouble. So while it’s good to see the team on the grid, the situation is still concerning. I’ve got nothing against Graeme Lowdon and John Booth, who are there for the right reasons and have worked very hard to get the team on the grid. Booth and Lowdon have worked hard Marussia began as Virgin Racing DUNBAR/LAT WorldMags.net knife-edge push to modify the nose and crash structures so an interim car could be readied. The focus on doing that also meant that resources have had to be taken away from its bespoke 2015 challenger. Manor knew that making it back to the grid was never going to be straightforward. It was always going to be a tightly focused effort, with little time to breathe and no room for things to go wrong. That’s why there is still plenty to do. It has a driver in Will Stevens, and it has secured its place on the entry list. Crash tests were booked for this week after AUTOSPORT closed for press. Yet it’s going to take something to deliver a car that will comfortably qualify within the 107 per cent rule. There are still political fights to sort out – especially because of that prize money. Chief discussion point now is the chassis name, which ultimately will decide if Manor qualifies for Marussia’s commercial-rights money or not. Watch this space. Fighting is something that Lowdon and Booth are well used to, though. And until all hope is gone, they will keep battling away like they have always done. MARCH 5 2015 AUTOSPORT.COM 67 PREVIEW “REJECTING THE 2014 CAR ALLOWANCE WAS A BLOW TO MANOR, BUT NOT A FATAL ONE” of commercial-rights income for this season. But the way the prize fund system works means that there are longer-term benefits, especially since Caterham’s demise has left only 10 teams on the grid. If a team finishes in the top 10 in two out of three years, then that £30 million-per-year income is safe. Manor is guaranteed a top-10 finish this year, so cannot fall out of the prize pool until at least the end of 2017, irrespective of what newcomer Haas does when it arrives next year. That is, unless, its rivals could derail its return. Which is exactly the opportunity that came up in February when F1’s Strategy Group met to discuss the proposal to allow teams to run a 2014 car. Since rejecting this could prevent Manor’s return – and in effect divide its income among the remaining teams – it was little surprise that there was not universal support. In fact, it was shot down by the first team to vote: Force India. But, while rejecting the 2014 car allowance was a blow to Manor, it was not a fatal one. It just made life much more difficult. The certainty of being able to race in Melbourne with a 2014 car was replaced with a 67 DUNBAR/LAT SEASON Bianchi points earned £30 million