Australian Govlink Vol 1 2014 | Page 15

FLEET MANAGEMENT As with most complex systems, which effectively running a fleet of vehicles is, it is not only a case of what you do it is more of how you do it. The best outcome for the organisation can be found in adhering to a basic process while refining particular aspects of the process that best fit the organisations business model and its mode of operations. However, all too often the management of the fleet is outsourced or tacked onto another function anywhere from the HR department to purchasing, accounting, or even a senior manager’s personal assistant who just happened to have some free time. Such an approach can lead to unintended consequences and outcomes that will cost the organisation financially and can put the organisation at risk of legal action against it. The challenge for organisations is to achieve greater effectiveness, and more importantly efficiency. As always the challenge remains how to do more with less through a process which provides benefits, increases service levels while dealing with Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) ‘Duty of Care’ responsibility and specific legislation such as, ‘Chain of Responsibility’ and ‘Fatigue Management’. When it comes to running a fleet of vehicles the imperative ‘do more with less’ is a virtue most often overlooked by many organisations. It’s a strange phenomenon considering that the cost of meeting the organisations transport needs is often the third largest outgoing, often greater than those of any other single department. Whether your transport needs are met via outsourced services, leased, rented, purchased or through using the employees’ own vehicles (known as grey fleet) the imperative is to get it right first time. How you acquire vehicles, sell them, maintain and repair them will have a substantial impact on the efficiency of operations and costs. By its nature the transport task is multifaceted with numerous regulatory influences that are required to be addressed. Although not in itself complicated or difficult, care is needed to ensure all bases are addressed and covered to ensure the best balance and outcome for the organisation. Get it wrong and the consequences can be substantial in both financial and legal terms. Operational environment The first and most important rule is to ensure that the organisations operational environment is clearly understood. By environment we mean the circumstances in which the business is required to operate. This is usually determined by the nature of your business and the legal, regulatory and conditions you are required to meet. These are dictated by the nature of the industry in which the organisation functions. Add to this the nature of any specific process, unique to your business, and any particular law or regulation, state or federal, which is applicable to the nature of your business and your mode of operations. Common treads All organisations have a clear responsibility to provide a ‘safe workplace’ for its employees and those performing activities on their behalf. This requirement is outlined in Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) legislation that dictates that the organisation is required to ‘do as much as is reasonably practical’ in meeting this requirement. Just what is reasonably practical is, and will remain, somewhat of a moving target for fleet managers and administrators. Responsibility for ensuring a comprehensive managed process is in place to identify, eliminate and reduce risk has been determined in the courts as resting solely with the organisation and that it cannot by outsourced or transferred to others. Before outlining the basic process it may be helpful to explore some of the refinements the organisation can adopt in its approach. To lease or buy? It’s one of the first predicaments faced by the organisation. Should vehicles be acquired via lease or purchased outright? In many instances, businesses make this decision based simply on what they have always done or a desire to keep the fleet costs off the balance sheet. Organisations need to be aware that the proposed new international accounting standards will require that all liabilities are s