Australian Govlink Issue 2, 2013 | Page 53

SECURITY • It may not always be appropriate to engage a person or company to provide services under a contracting arrangement; • Trying to squeeze a work arrangement into a ‘contracting box’, when the circumstances call for an employment arrangement and compliance with applicable industrial regulation, can have expensive consequences; and, • Using contracting to push responsibility for compliance with applicable industrial regulation – and liability for non-compliance – down the supply chain may not work. The former Fair Work Ombudsman, Nick Wilson, warned last year that: “Turning a corporately-sanctioned ‘blind-eye’ to outsourced work that is performed by another enterprise using contractors on below-award rates of pay may expose enterprises up the procurement chain to liability. All parties should undertake due diligence when outsourcing work to contracted workers, particularly to lowest-cost providers, to ensure lower costs are attributable to efficiencies in the business and not due to the potential exploitation of workers on below award rates.” So, what now? The very nature of the security industry means that there is a commercial imperative for security businesses to subcontract work to meet short term spikes in client demand. Having said that however, the practice of sham subcontracting has a negative effect on the entire industry and its customers. Part of the solution is for government agencies to show leadership when allocating security contracts. They can do this by placing greater emphasis on quality service provision rather than the lowest possible price, which inevitably encourages lower quality service from unscrupulous providers. Education of clients is the key, whether government or corporate. In this regard ASIAL is working with FWO on the Local Government Procurement Initiative, which in time will to extend include other levels of government. We will work with all government agencies to develop fair and transparent guidelines that will produce certainty and confidence throughout the supply chain, resulting in a more professional and sustainable private security industry. Note: The information provided above is for convenient reference only. ASIAL and Chris Delaney & Associates Pty Ltd provide this information on the basis that it is not to be relied upon in any or all cases, as the circumstances in each matter are specific. Accordingly, we provide this information for general reference only, but we advise you take no action without prior reference to an Employee Relations professional. ASIAL members can contact Chris Delaney by emailing [email protected] Govlink Issue 2 2013 49