Australian Doctor 8th March issue | Page 24

24 HOW TO TREAT : PREVENTING CERVICAL CANCER ausdoc . com . au
8 MARCH 2024

24 HOW TO TREAT : PREVENTING CERVICAL CANCER ausdoc . com . au

Figure 6 . Screening participation , participants aged 25-74 , 2018-2021 . Source : AIHW National Cervical Screening Program monitoring report 2022 5
PAGE 22
assessment and data col-
Specific programs are being devel-
higher risk of having cervical disease
The only validated swab for self-col-
with age , reflecting natural immu-
lation , including participation rates ,
oped to address equity of access for
than those undergoing routine screen-
lection in Australia is the red-topped
nity . Of note is the persistence of low
rates of HPV infection , and follow-up information .
The register also provides data to
Indigenous populations , particularly in rural and remote settings . 11 Programs looking at specific needs in
ing . Performing the HPV and cytology tests concurrently decreases the risk of either a false-negative HPV result or
flocked swab ( see figure 8 ). It is vital that this is the only type used , as it is the specific nature of the swab that
rates of infection with HPV 16 or 18 . The rates of HPV infection in all age groups are higher in the self-col-
the AIHW for its annual report . 5
these communities such as “ see and
false-negative cytology .
releases the viral DNA particles appro-
lection subgroup .
Participation and equity of access
Even before the 2017 renewal of Aus-
treat ” are being investigated .
Australia ’ s understanding of the significance of equity of access and barriers to screening has prompted
The sample , therefore , has to be taken from the cervix and collected into a liquid-filled jar .
If the patient is negative for HPV
priately into the test analyser .
The only collection device for clinician-collected swabs is the cervix sampler / broom / cytobrush .
Rates of detection of abnormalities
The rates of histologically-proven
tralia ’ s cervical screening program ,
the introduction of the self-collect
they return in five years for routine
Figure 7 outlines the management
high-grade lesions , stratified by year ,
it was known that participation had
screening option .
screening .
algorithms for the self-collect pathway .
appear in figure 10 .
fallen substantially from its peak in the early 2000s .
It is difficult to get an accurate current participation rate . The latest
SELF-COLLECT
THE Concept of self-collecting a cervical screening test sample has been
If the patient tests positive for HPV 16 or 18 , NCSP guidelines recommend direct referral for colposcopy , where a sample for cervical cytology will be
Outcomes of self-collection to date
The latest NCSR data since the expan-
Notably , there has been a significant increase in detection of high-grade abnormalities since the introduction of HPV testing in Aus-
figures from the AIHW assess partic-
understood for many years ; this is now
taken . Douglass Hanly Moir pathology
sion of self-collection to all eligible
tralia ’ s screening program . This
ipation at 62 % but this number also
possible because of the highly sensi-
continues to recommend cytology be
Australians shows there has been
was to be expected as it reflects the
includes people returning for repeat
tive nature of HPV DNA testing . Some
done prior to colposcopy , as many col-
a consistent increase in self-collec-
higher sensitivity of HPV testing
HPV testing after a previous positive
efforts were made to have a self-col-
poscopists prefer to have the cytology
tion uptake when analysed by age ,
result . 5
lection option for cervical cytology but
result at the time of examination .
remoteness index and socio-eco-
POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE
Recruitment and participation
this was never really feasible .
If the patient tests positive for HPV
nomic status . Uptake of self-col-
An important measure in any screen-
remain a significant issue for the cer-
International studies , including
non 16 / 18 , the NCSP recommends the
lection has also increased among
ing program is the confirmation
vical program as some 70 % of cervi-
meta-analyses , have shown that a
patient returns to the clinician for a cer-
under-screened people . In March
rate of abnormalities . This shows
cal cancers occur in those who have
self-collected vaginal test is as sensi-
vical cytology sample , as management
2023 the rate was about 20 % of all
how many patients sent to colpos-
never been screened .
tive as a clinician-collected cervical
depends on the result of the cervical
samples . 14
copy will have a high-grade lesion
One of the major tasks of the pro-
HPV test . 12
cytology .
The rate of HPV positivity is sig-
detected .
gram is to ensure equity of access
A self-collection option was ini-
If the cytology is negative , or
nificantly higher in self-collected
AIHW data and work from the
and elimination of barriers to partic-
tially included in the protocol for the
shows possible or low-grade lesions , a
compared with clinician-collected
Douglass Hanly Moir laboratory
ipation . Marginalised and under-ser-
renewed program in 2017 but was
repeat HPV test is recommended in 12
samples ( 9.72 versus 8.04 , p < 0.001 ).
show this rate to be 24 %. This is well
viced groups need to be identified
restricted to under-screened women
months ’ time . If the cytology shows a
Early analysis of this information
above the internationally accepted
and targeted for attention .
older than 30 . The uptake was rela-
high-grade , glandular or possible high-
suggests this is because of a higher
level of 10 % and indicates that the
Participation rates vary significantly depending on geographic location . These rates reflect the incidence and mortality rates of cervical disease , highlighting the significance of
tively low .
As previously outlined , increasing the participation rate and providing equity of access to all eligible participants in the screening program is of
grade lesions , then a referral directly to colposcopy is indicated .
There has been much discussion as to whether self-testing could be done via mail-out or whether a swab could
positivity among under- and never-screened people compared with those previously screened . Unsatisfactory sample rates were higher with self-collection than clini-
screening program is working well . 15
CASE STUDIES
Case study one
ROMA , a 36-year-old woman , pre-
equity of access ( see figure 6 ).
utmost importance .
be given to the patient to undertake the
cian-collection ( 1.98 % versus 0.13 %,
sents to the GP requesting a sexually
Consideration of equity of access
In July 2022 the self-collection
test at home .
p < 0.001 ). 14
transmitted infection ( STI ) check .
needs to be given to Indigenous , cul-
option became available for all people
For the self-collected test to be as
Importantly , patients have been
She is new to the practice . Roma has
turally and linguistically diverse , and LGBTIQ + communities .
Any patient with , or who has had ,
eligible for cervical screening . This option is suitable for both primary screening and as 12-month fol-
sensitive as the clinician-collected sample , the sampling needs to be done under well-controlled circumstances ,
returning for further investigation at a reasonable rate .
There was about a 70 % rate of
recently entered a new relationship with a female partner . She identifies as lesbian and uses the pronoun
a cervix should have access to and be
low-up HPV testing where the patient
with validated swabs , transport and
colposcopy after a self-collect posi-
‘ her ’.
encouraged to participate in cervical
has tested positive to non 16 / 18 with
testing .
tive test for HPV 16 or 18 and about
Her past medical history is unre-
screening services .
negative or low-grade cytology .
Recently published data from the
70 % of people returned for a liq-
markable . She keeps fit and healthy
Lesbian women report almost half
It is important to note that a
Netherlands cervical screening pro-
uid-base cytology within six months
with exercise and diet . She has no
the rates of cervical screening of het-
self-collected sample cannot be used
gram - which also offered a self-collect
of a self-collected non16 / 18 HPV pos-
symptoms or signs of any STI but ,
erosexual women and account for a
where a co-test ( simultaneous HPV
option - showed an uptake of around
itive result . 14
given this is a new relationship ,
much higher proportion of individuals who have never been screened compared with their heterosexual counterparts . 9 , 10
and cytology ) is the recommended investigation . The two major clinical situations where this applies are for a symptomatic patient ( potential symp-
7 % of all samples . 13
Notably , self-collected samples had a significantly lower rate of detection of both HPV and high-grade lesions than
Rates of detection of HPV related to age
Recent AIHW data provides an indi-
would like to be screened for chlamydia and gonorrhoea .
When the GP asks whether she has ever had any cervical screening tests ,
Lesbian and bisexual women
toms or signs of cervical cancer ) and
clinician-collected samples , a finding
cation of the rates of detection of HPV
Roma advises she had a Pap smear
and transgender men who have not
when a patient is undergoing a test of
contrary to previous studies .
by subtype ( see figure 9 ).
10 years ago . She cannot remember
undergone hysterectomy have been
cure .
Detailed analysis shows that the
The figure is stratified by age and
the result but found the whole expe-
specifically included as priority pop-
A clinician-collected sample is
collection methodology was causing
clearly shows the highest rate of
rience unpleasant and embarrassing
ulations in both the recent draft Aus-
needed in each of these cases so that
the lower sensitivity , highlighting the
infection is in the younger age group ,
and has not been tested since . Roma
tralian Cancer Plan and the draft
an HPV and cytology test can be done
importance of the collection proce-
with most infections being the
has also been told that gay women do
National Strategy for the Elimination
concurrently .
dure . The Netherlands subsequently
non-vaccine subtypes .
not need screening .
of Cervical Cancer in Australia .
These patients are at significantly
changed their protocols .
The rate of infection diminishes
The GP orders the appropriate