Examination
During clinical intervals when there is
| |||||
no pain , abdominal examination may | |||||
be normal . Following a recent attack | |||||
of biliary colic , there may be epigastric | |||||
or right upper quadrant tenderness | |||||
, while in acute disease there may | |||||
be significant focal right upper quadrant | |||||
tenderness and focal peritonism . | |||||
In the presence of pancreatitis , the | |||||
patient may have severe epigastric | |||||
tenderness or indeed an acute abdomen | |||||
. In the presence of cholangitis , | |||||
there may be pain , fever , jaundice , | |||||
dark urine , bilirubin on urinalysis , and | |||||
signs of septicaemia . There may be a | |||||
palpable gallbladder in the presence of | |||||
acute cholecystitis with empyema of | |||||
the gallbladder . | |||||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
THE differential diagnosis of pain
| |||||
associated with gallstones appears | |||||
in box 1 . The most common of these | |||||
are peptic ulcer disease , pancreatic | |||||
inflammation , reflux disease , constipation | |||||
and chest wall pain . | |||||
INVESTIGATIONS
IN patients presenting with biliary
| |||||
colic , perform haematology and biochemical | |||||
screening , including FBC , |
inflammatory markers ESR and CRP , LFTs , electrolytes , renal function , cal- |
Figure 2 . Gallstones . |
cium and magnesium , amylase / lipase . |
|||||
Ultrasound remains the linch- |
bile duct may predict the presence of |
negative when performed at an inter- |
neoplasia . The presence of an inflam- |
inflammation , and is useful in avoid- |
|
pin for diagnosis of gallstones . Order |
stones , raising clinical suspicion . |
val between acute attacks . |
matory pseudocyst , pancreatic necro- |
ing diagnostic endoscopic retrograde |
|
an ultrasound as the primary imag- |
CT scanning only detects 20 % of |
CT scanning of the pancreas may |
sis , or peripancreatic collection may |
cholangiopancreatography ( ERCP ), |
|
ing modality in all patients presenting |
gallstones and is not a sensitive test |
be performed if there is clinical suspi- |
be identified . |
which has a risk of pancreatitis . |
|
with upper abdominal pain . An ultrasound may show the presence of gallstones , gallbladder inflammation or |
for biliary colic . 9 Biochemical analysis may indicate an abnormality of LFTs , suggesting |
cion of low-grade pancreatic inflammation . More severe cases are usually investigated in hospital . CT scanning |
Clinical suspicion of the presence of CBD stones can be confirmed on MRI with magnetic resonance chol- |
MANAGEMENT
LAPAROSCOPIC cholecystectomy
|
|
dilation of the CBD , which indicates |
stones within the CBD , or may show |
of the pancreas is highly accurate |
angiopancreatography ( MRCP ). This |
( LC ) remains the least morbid and |
|
a risk of stone disease in the CBD and |
elevation of amylase / lipase indicative |
in identifying residual inflamma- |
is a sensitive test for stones within |
most acceptable gold standard treat- |
|
a greater risk for the patient . Ultrasound is not an accurate test for stones |
of pancreatic inflammation . Biochemical tests frequently fluctuate dur- |
tion after a previous attack , suggestive of pancreatitis or excluding the |
the CBD and gallbladder . It evaluates the pancreas and pancreatic duct , |
ment for symptomatic gallstones . 10 Open surgery for more compli- |
within the CBD , but distention of the |
ing attacks of biliary colic and may be |
alternative diagnosis of pancreatic |
may demonstrate pancreatic cysts or |
cated issues remains an |
PAGE 22 |