Australian Doctor 20th June 2025 | Page 4

20 JUNE 2025 4 NEWS ausdoc. com. au

20 JUNE 2025 4 NEWS ausdoc. com. au

40 pharmacists qualify as‘ doctors’

Jamie Thannoo FORTY graduate pharmacists can
University in Queensland began preparing a five-year extended mas-
Qualifications Framework meant students already part way through a
UNSW Sydney also offers a Level 9 qualification as part of a five-year
already call themselves‘ doctor’
ter’ s degree to confer the title, while
Level 9 pharmacy qualification— an
combined bachelor’ s and master’ s
despite not knowing they would
extended master’ s— could receive the
degree for pharmacists.
receive the title when they started their degrees.
Minister for Health and Ageing Mark Butler announced last year that pharmacists who completed an
Students part way through degrees could get the title.
title as soon as the change was official.
Griffith University in Queensland said 34 students had graduated from its Master of Pharmacy( extended) program in March and April 2025 and
However, because the program only started in 2023, its first‘ doctors’ will not graduate until 2027.
According to the co-ordinator for the new University of WA degree, Dr
extended master’ s degree could call
had received the‘ doctor’ title.
Amy Page( PhD), the qualifications
themselves‘ doctors’, similar to cer-
the University of WA began pre-
Another six students who gradu-
will support more pharmacists to
tain dentists, vets, optometrists and
paring a one-year online degree for
ated from Charles Darwin University’ s
take up undersubscribed work, such
Dr Amy Page( PhD).
physiotherapists. Subsequently, James Cook
already-qualified pharmacists. But the change to the Australian
extended master’ s program in May gained the title in the same way.
as medication reviews and diabetes education.

GP cleared over love affair

FROM PAGE 1
them all,” the
tribunal said.
“[ We accept ] those messages
were lighthearted
banter.
“ They are redolent with
punctuation and capitals for
emphasis, emojis, and refer
to various subjects of a social
nature.”
The GP told the tribunal
that they had met again
in person at a gathering of
mutual friends and that their
relationship had evolved
naturally.
It had become sexual in
May 2020, and the GP had left
the practice about six weeks
later.
Another GP gave expert
evidence to the tribunal that
doctor – patient boundaries
were challenging in“ small
community settings” based
on his firsthand experience,
saying he had practised for 29
years in the town where he
grew up and where his children
went to school.
The tribunal— which also
said the patient had recurrent
pain, not chronic pain—
concluded that there was no
evidence the GP had taken
advantage of the patient.
“ The tribunal accepts that
age can be relevant to vulnerability
as a general principle,
but there is no evidence that it
was in this particular case.”
It said the therapeutic relationship
was short, uncomplicated
and“ ended naturally”.
“ The tribunal finds that
the sexual relationship
started in the context of
activities totally disassociated
with the doctor – patient
relationship.”