TWO IN THIS ISSUE |
|||
Ischaemic heart disease in women
HOW TO TREAT, PAGE 25
|
The life and deaths of health workers in Gaza
NEWS REVIEW, PAGE 46
|
Le collège des chirurgiens ne regrette rien?
ANALYSIS, PAGE 7
|
Bisphosphonate‘ treatment breaks’
THERAPY UPDATE, PAGE 42
|
The medical board investigation ran for three years.
Heather Saxena A GP in a small town accused of misconduct
for starting a relationship with a patient a few weeks after their therapeutic relationship ended has been cleared.
The Medical Board of Australia spent three years investigating the
|
relationship. By the time of the tribunal hearing in April this year, the pair had had a child together.
The tribunal heard that the GP, whose name was suppressed, had met the patient in 2019 while working in a town of 2300 people,“ where everyone knows everyone or knows of everyone”.
The medical board alleged the patient was vulnerable because of their 20-year age difference and because she had chronic pain.
|
Additionally, the relationship had begun“ very shortly” after their final consultation.
The tribunal was told the GP had treated the patient eight times between 2019 and 2020, including for a URTI, dysmenorrhoea and pain following a laparoscopy, prescribing short-term oxycodone and tramadol. The patient, aged 22 when they met, said she had booked with
whoever was available and that the consultations were“ insignificant”.
“ She recalled during appointments the practitioner being professional,
‘ The patient did not once feel intimidated.’
she did not once feel intimidated or uncomfortable, there was no flirtatious exchange between them and she did not feel any sense of emotional or
|
other dependence on the practitioner,” the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal said.
About a week after her last appointment— a phone consult regarding pathology results and iron supplement scripts— the pair had become Facebook friends when the patient thanked the GP for lending a kayak to mutual acquaintances.
From there, they had exchanged several messages.
“ The tribunal has read PAGE 4
|