“ spasmodic reactions the patient was |
A year earlier , more than 200 |
|||
not consciously aware of ”. |
Dutch doctors announced their |
|||
But the question remained |
objection to euthanasia for advanced |
|||
whether the doctor had wrongly |
dementia patients . |
|||
assumed the woman ( once she was |
“ To someone who cannot con- |
|||
deemed decisionally incapable ) still |
firm that he wants to die ? No , we are |
|||
had an “ explicit and serious desire ” |
not going to do that . Our moral reluc- |
|||
for euthanasia . |
tance to end the life of a defenceless |
|||
The judges sided with the doctor . |
human being is too great ,” their state- |
|||
They said , in view of the state of |
ment said . |
|||
profound dementia the patient was in |
Dr Carmel Kouprie is a psychia- |
|||
at the time of her death , the accused |
trist registrar and a committee mem- |
|||
“ did not have the obligation to obtain |
ber at the Euthanasia and Psychiatry |
|||
information from the patient about |
Commission , which is part of the |
|||
her present wish to live or to die ”. |
Dutch Society for Psychiatry . |
|||
When it comes to incapacitated |
Her work has given her insight |
|||
|
Voluntary manslaughter
Back in 2016 , there was a euthanasia
case involving a 74-year-old patient with dementia that subsequently
|
euthanasia on the patient without a further and consistent confirmation of her wish to die .”
As the trial ran , the court was told
|
she “ constantly says she wants to die , but after five minutes , she says not now ”.
Her GP also told the court she
|
patients , oral verification of their wishes to live and their suffering is impossible .
“ Setting this requirement [ to secure oral verification ] would be
|
into the way euthanasia affects the doctors who choose to perform it .
“ Euthanasia is very scary for a lot of doctors , and it feels like a risk , especially because you are
|
made headlines around the world . |
that the woman ’ s advance directive |
claimed to be “ doing well ” when |
detrimental to the living will of |
judged afterwards ,” she told Aus- |
It involved a geriatrician who had |
included a clause acknowledging the |
asked about her condition and no |
the patient , which is specifically |
tralian Doctor . |
performed euthanasia on a woman |
degree of discretion her physician |
longer understood what he meant |
intended for the situation in which |
“ I think the biggest thing is that |
with dementia who had to be physi- |
would have over the end of her life . |
when he tried to ask her about |
the person who drafted the living |
someone is going to die because |
cally restrained by her family . |
“ By signing this request for eutha- |
euthanasia . |
will ends up in a state of unbeara- |
of you . |
The doctor was charged with vol- |
nasia , I therefore consciously accept |
When it was explained to her , she |
ble and hopeless suffering and is no |
“ You do not sleep very well the |
untary manslaughter under article |
the possibility that a physician might |
said : “ No , I don ’ t want that .” |
longer able to express his will ,” the |
night before . You do not sleep very |
293 of the Penal Code . |
comply with the request , about |
“ I explained to her that she would |
court wrote . |
well the night after . It is a very |
The District Court of The Hague |
which I might have come to think dif- |
be admitted and that she then had |
But there is an important point |
intense thing .” |
was told that the patient had written a directive asking to be euthanised if she had to enter a care home . |
ferently in my present state of mind ,” she had stated .
But as her condition deteriorated
|
to stay there and that she earlier had expressed that she didn ’ t want that and then I started about euthanasia . |
here . Ultimately , the case was not about the judges trying to establish whether the patient was experienc- |
VAD in Australia
The VAD system in Australia is still in
|
Multiple independent physicians |
at the start of 2016 , she began to issue |
“ She said , ‘ Yes , I might [ have |
ing unbearable suffering , whether |
its infancy , where the eligibility cri- |
and family members had agreed that |
ambivalent and contradictory state- |
wanted ] it then but not now ,’” the GP |
the patient had “ wanted ” to die and |
teria have been largely restricted to |
her condition aligned with her direc- |
ments about euthanasia . |
told the court . |
the conceptual issues of what that |
those likely to die within 12 months |
tive ’ s description of unbearable suf- |
Her husband told the court that |
Nursing staff also said that , during |
means in the case of a patient with |
who face unbearable suffering . |
fering , and so a sedative was put in |
advanced dementia . |
But it is founded on the require- |
||
her coffee . |
It was about whether the doc- |
ment that , at the moment of their |
||
Despite this , the woman began |
tor had gone through the processes |
death , they are fully aware of what is |
||
moving and making noises before the |
laid down by the law to establish |
about to be done to them . |
||
drug was administered and had to be |
whether the patient was experienc- |
But the debate is evolving . |
||
restrained while the lethal injection |
ing unbearable suffering and was |
Dementia Australia currently |
||
was administered . |
expressing consent . |
stresses it has no position on the |
||
The prosecution alleged the |
It was an issue about whether the |
question of euthanasia but says it |
||
doctor had acted without proper |
geriatrician had shown due care or if |
supports what it describes as the right |
||
assent by performing eutha- |
she had been reckless . |
of every person , including those liv- |
||
nasia on a patient expressing |
Dr Mulder said even with |
ing with dementia , to exercise choice |
||
“ contraindications ”. |
the sovereignty assigned to the |
over end-of-life care options , which it |
||
“ A written living will has to be |
advance care directive , doctors in |
says may include VAD measures . |
||
verified as long as an incapacitated |
the Netherlands retain a significant |
Clearly , the ethical debate sur- |
||
patient is still able to express a spe- |
degree of discretion in making the |
rounding euthanasia in the context of |
||
cific ( coherent ) wish to live or die ,” |
final determination . |
dementia is not simply about concep- |
||
it argued . |
“[ Physician ] discretion is only |
tual abstractions . |
||
“ Since the patient at some point in time made statements that can be taken to mean that she thought euthanasia went too far and that she did not want to die yet , the accused was not allowed to practise |
Dr Thomas Mulder ( PhD ). |
logical as [ consent ] would entirely depend on the specific circumstances of each case and no laws or guidelines could prescribe how to determine whether consent has been expressed in detail as every |
If this news story has raised issues for you , or you are concerned about someone you know , call Lifeline on 13 11 14 . You can also contact your local Doctors ’ Health Advisory Service . |