without the retraction notice , can still be accessed through the author ’ s ResearchGate profile .
Pay-to-publish
It is worth mentioning that retractionwatch . com — perhaps home to the biggest menagerie of zombie papers in the world — now lists over 430 retracted COVID- 19 papers , ranging from whether noise from banging utensils together can kill coronavirus to large RCTs using hydroxychloroquine as a treatment .
The problem spans the globe , though many zombie papers seem to emerge from China , Iran , India and Pakistan .
Their rise is primarily a product of academic pressure : the competition for jobs and promotions when resources to conduct
|
There is also usually radio silence from offending authors . Australian Doctor ’ s attempt to contact Dr Elgazzar for this article failed , for instance .
It seems most authors ignore allegations until the incident fades from public memory .
Laziness
According to Professor Mol , zombie hunting is not hard . The data discrepancies are relatively easy to pick up .
That said , he is reluctant to dish out the secrets , lest the ‘ zombies ’ find a way around his net .
“ The thing is that researchers who are fabricating data are lazy ,” he says .
“ If they were not lazy , they would do the actual research . But since they are lazy , they will
|
So what happened to ivermectin as a COVID-19 wonder drug ?
Dr Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz ( PhD ) is an epidemiologist at the University of Wollongong in NSW who played a leading role in exposing the flaws in ivermectin research .
The drug became so popular as a potential treatment option during the pandemic that the TGA banned its prescription outside its indicated use — scabies and other parasitical infections . What is the general consensus now on the treatment ? “ We now have a group of large , independently funded studies that have failed to find a benefit for the drug ,” he says .
“ We can say with a great deal of certainty that ivermectin does not work as a treatment for COVID-19 .
“ There still hasn ’ t been much good research on the drug as a prophylactic , but given the complete failure to find any results as a treatment , any benefit for prophylaxis is unlikely .”
You can read his blog on the topic here : bit . ly / 3AoxXFu
|
||
quality research are restricted . |
always make mistakes .” |
|||
But what has made the envi- |
In some cases , detection |
ronment worse , according to |
involves arranging a dataset in |
Integrity in Guidelines and Evi- |
researchers and publishers to |
|||||||
Professor Mol , is the advent of |
ascending or descending order |
dence Synthesis Framework . |
improve understanding of the |
|||||||
the ‘ pay-to-publish ’ model in |
on an Excel spreadsheet to reveal |
It recommends an expert com- |
papers ’ origin . |
|||||||
research , amid demands for |
any repeating patterns . |
mittee assign integrity scores |
“ It is like a river being pol- |
|||||||
research to be open access . |
“ For example , you might |
to research papers selected for |
luted at the source , but we are |
|||||||
Without revenue coming |
end up realising that too many |
inclusion in meta-analyses or |
trying to clean it up halfway |
|||||||
linked to the creation of paywalls , |
patients in a dataset have the |
guidelines . |
downstream — we need to stop |
|||||||
publishers turn to the authors as |
exact same BMI , age and birth- |
An attempt is then made to |
the pollution at the source ,” he |
|||||||
an alternative source . |
weight combination . |
contact authors of questionable |
says . |
|||||||
“ With publishers now being |
“ Or sections of the tables may |
RCTs to gain more information . |
“ Facebook and TikTok are |
|||||||
paid a fee for open access , they |
have simply been copied from |
The committee then makes a |
now being held responsible for |
|||||||
are less likely to reject papers in |
one section to another .” |
call on which papers to leave out . |
their content , even though it is |
|||||||
some pockets of social media . |
|
The solution
Improved peer review could pre-
|
Professor Mol also recommends actively escalating matters with the journals concerned |
user-generated . “ The same principle must be applied to journal publishers .” |
||||||
The Egyptian paper was subsequently retracted over concerns of plagiarism and revelations that the raw data did not support the conclusions drawn .
However , the original paper ,
|
nalists should be holding them to account ,” Professor Mol declares .
Research integrity sleuths also point out that journals , even when informed of dodgy practice , often take decades to retract papers .
|
vent studies ever becoming part of the living dead , but the issue is big , and most regulators are yet to acknowledge the problem .
His team ’ s solution is something called the Research
|
where there are serious questions — so that such papers may be retracted and removed from circulation .
There also needs to be more active engagement with
|
References :
• Monash University : PCOS guideline ( 2023 ) bit . ly / 3yELCrw
• EClinicalMedicine 2024 ; 16 Jul .
• Res Sq 2021 ; 14 Jul .
|
||||||
NEW |