Australian Doctor 12th July Issue 2024 | Page 40

News Review

12 JULY 2024 ausdoc . com . au
| THE | HEARTS AND MINDS SPECIAL

Are brain implant patient

Rachel Fieldhouse Journalist at Australian Doctor .
Ethicists are concerned about what happens when device makers walk away .

BACK In 2010 , Rita Leggett received a brain implant that changed her life .

She had lived with severe
chronic epilepsy for decades ,
but she received a neural device
— known as a brain – computer
interface ( BCI ) — as part of a
clinical trial .
It detected oncoming seizures
, sending an alert to a
handheld device that gave Ms
Leggett enough of a warning for
her to administer prophylactic
clonazepam .
Her seizures reduced from
three a month to zero .
But within two years , this
transformation was deliberately
reversed . The trial ended
BCIs in clinical trials is lead-
systems ,” he said .
because the company behind it ,
ing to more cases of ‘ device
“ Elon Musk ’ s Neuralink is in
NeuroVista , failed to generate
abandonment ’.
the same position as us .
interest from investors . So Ms Leggett returned to a hospital in Melbourne to have
Explantation
“ Imagine a device can forecast
“ Let ’ s say you get meningitis or the electrodes do not work reliably over long periods of
the BCI surgically removed .
your seizures , allowing you to
time .
“ The device was like an alien
take medication , so you are sta-
“ Then the trial will stop . And
at first ; you grow gradually into
ble after 49 years of chronic epi-
Elon Musk , the richest man in
it and get used to it , so it then
lepsy , and then suddenly the
the world , will not be able to
becomes a part of every day ,”
company tells you it has to be
keep the trial going .”
she told researchers . “ I felt like I could do anything .
explanted because it does not have any money ,” he said .
“ That is quite traumatic .”
Funding
After the NeuroVista trial folded
“ I could drive ; I could see
It has led some of the subjects
in 2013 , Professor Cook said “ a
people ; I was more capable of
taking part in trials to ‘ resist ’
lot of people ” came to him argu-
making good decisions .” She is not the only one affected .
BCI removal — trying to keep the device and maintain it without the support of whichever com-
Professor Mark Cook .
ing that the Federal Government should intervene and keep the BCIs running .
Startups
While BCIs have become commer-
pany set up the trial . In the case of the US-based
BROADEN trial — which ran
suggestion was that she was forced to undergo surgery to
not functioning ,” he told Australian Doctor .
But he said the cost and patient numbers for BCI trials made it impossible .
cially available for Parkinson ’ s dis-
from 2008 to 2012 and used deep
have the implant removed .
“ While certainly she would
You can get a sense of why .
ease , tremor and epilepsy , trials of
brain stimulation implants to
However , case report co-au-
have preferred to keep using it , it
To generate the material in
experimental BCIs have contin-
treat patients with depression —
thor Professor Mark Cook , the
is wrong to say there are people
the study cost about $ 200 mil-
ued , including the use of targeted
the trial was terminated because
neurologist who led the BROADEN
getting brain implants removed
lion for the 15 patients involved .
deep brain stimulation to treat
the effect did not reach statisti-
“ If only one person benefited
depression .
Just this year , amid a flurry of publicity , Elon Musk ’ s company Neuralink implanted its first BCI into a man with quadriplegia .
It allowed the patient , Noland
cal significance .
But Professor Gilbert said some patients wanted to keep the devices that they felt were providing a benefit .
They were successful , but the
‘ It is wrong to say there are people getting brain implants removed against their will .’
— Professor Mark Cook
from a drug , should the government build a factory to make that drug for one person ?” he asked .
He said it may have been different if a company had folded
Arbaugh , to control a computer
reason was because brain stim-
after selling a proven and com-
cursor with his brain impulses and play computer games — such
ulation had by then become an established treatment for Par-
trial , said this was inaccurate . He said the device was turned
against their will .”
He said the negative per-
mercialised device to patients . But for him , the key issue was
as chess , RuneScape and Civiliza-
kinson ’ s disease and there was
off when the trial ended ; the
ception of BCI trials stemmed ,
that the clinical trial partici-
tion — for the first time in almost
an infrastructure in place within
surgery to remove it , in itself ,
in part , from participants not
pants were fully informed about
a decade .
the healthcare system that could
did not take away Ms Leggett ’ s
viewing them in the same way
what would possibly and proba-
But neuroethicist Professor
absorb those patients .
ability to manage her seizures .
as other clinical trials , such as
bly happen afterwards depend-
Frédéric Gilbert , co-author of a
In the case of Ms Leggett ,
“ There was no way to analyse
drug trials .
ing on the trial ’ s results .
new case report on Ms Leggett ,
that did not happen .
the data from the device , and
“ Fundamentally , there is a
“ Patients in the NeuroVista
has warned that the increas-
The way her surgery was
there was no point having the
failure to understand that we
trial were really brave because
ing number of startups testing
reported in the media , the
device remain in situ as it was
are not providing commercial
we did not know that it would