Screening in the asymptomatic population
The 2023 NHMRC guidelines for
| ||||
stratification of risk of CRC in | ||||
the Australian population appear | ||||
in table 1. The most significant | ||||
changes are that family members | ||||
include both sides of the family( the | ||||
relatives do not need to be all on the | ||||
same side); the removal of the use | ||||
of barium enemas and flexible sigmoidoscopy | ||||
for screening; and individual | ||||
recommendations for each of | ||||
the high-risk cancer syndromes. | ||||
Most Australians will be at average | ||||
risk or slightly above average risk | ||||
( Category 1). For these patients, FOBT | ||||
is the current recommendation for | ||||
ages 45-74. Under the current NBCSP, | ||||
adult patients are sent an FOBT in the | ||||
mail at age 50, and repeat testing is | ||||
performed every two years until age | ||||
74. The government has not made | ||||
a commitment yet to send screening | ||||
kits to the expanded age group of |
45-49 years.
Community uptake of FOBT has remained stubbornly low at
|
Figure 1. Familial adenomatosis polyposis. |
around 43 %, although this is an |
||||
improvement on the 35 % previously recorded. 6 There is strong evidence to suggest that support, validation and confirmation of this program by GPs will improve uptake. 6 Therefore, conversations between GPs and their patients form a vital part of the screening program and should be |
45-49 being included in the screening guidelines.
Further modelling showed that lowering the screening age further to 40 would still reduce the disease burden further and be somewhat cost-effective. 6 The taskforce decided to recommend against low-
|
Also consider screening in patients over the age of 74. Although they are not included in the NBCSP, as for patients aged 40-44 years, it would be reasonable to continue screening for healthy adults between the ages of 75 and 85 who have had a discussion with |
population screening tool. The US has typically used colonoscopy, with both the American Cancer Society and the US Preventive Services Task Force( USPSTF) recommending colonoscopy from the age of 45. 7 However, this approach has not been followed in Australia because of the |
only once, allows for a colonoscopy without a stated reason.
Colonoscopy has about a 10-15 % better detection rate than FOBT in the asymptomatic patient. However, this increased diagnosis needs to be balanced against the risks of colonoscopy( see box 2). If the patient
|
documented appropriately.
PATIENTS UNDER 50 OR OVER 74 Although numerous changes are being considered, one of the most significant is the change in screening age to 45. This has been
|
Community uptake of FOBT has remained stubbornly low at around 43 %, although this is an improvement on the 35 % previously recorded. |
cost burden of colonoscopy over the entire population.
Changes to the MBS have also made it difficult for patients to undergo a colonoscopy for screening purposes only. The MBS item number 32222( endoscopic examination
|
understands and agrees to the risks, then it is reasonable to proceed with the colonoscopy. 7
OTHER SCREENING AND PREVENTION ADVICE Educate all adult patients regarding
|
|
prompted by the large increase in |
of the colon to the caecum by colo- |
dietary and lifestyle guidelines to |
cancers in those aged younger than |
ering the screening age to 40; how- |
their GP regarding the possible ben- |
noscopy, for a patient) requires a |
reduce the risk of bowel cancer( see |
50. Modelling performed on behalf |
ever, there is a recommendation |
efits and potential harms. |
specific indication( see box 3). How- |
box 4). It is also important to advise |
of the NHMRC showed both a signif- |
that it is reasonable to start screen- |
ever, item 32228( endoscopic exam- |
patients that their family history |
|
icant reduction in disease burden as |
ing at age 40 for patients who have |
THE ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENT |
ination of the colon to the caecum |
can change; educate them about |
well as an increase in cost-effective- |
had a discussion with their GP |
AT AVERAGE RISK WHO DESIRES |
by colonoscopy, other than a service |
the importance of a family history |
ness for lowering the screening age to 45. 6 This has led to patients aged |
regarding the possible benefits and potential harms. |
COLONOSCOPY In Australia, FOBT is used as a |
to which item 32222, 32223, 32224, 32225, or 32226 applies), applicable |
of bowel cancer and the need to alert their GP if a family member is |