AST June 2018 Magazine Volume 24 | Page 47

Volume 24 concern is, who bears the At the same time, there is increased rec- June 2018 Edition Another ognition that a return-on-investment ap- cost? proach is needed to determine levels of The Secure Journeys Working Group, found- spend by each stakeholder, considering ed by SITA, is one forum through which par- potential cost savings as well as security ticipants across the air transport ecosystem can collaborate on improving airport security improvements. through the use of innovative technologies. CONCLUSION Just as all stakeholders involved in enabling a safe and secure air travel passenger experience have a shared The US Government first required an auto- responsibility to the passenger and to each other, the mated system to match arrival and depar- cost of enhancing and facilitating security should not ture information in 1996. fall on one entity, but be shared among all stakehold- ers. Following the 9/11 attacks, the requirement was This is a topic that has already been explored with some success – for example the TSA is help- ing to fund airport improvements through its facility modification other transaction agree- ment (OTA). strengthened to include biometrics. In Decem- ber last year, the US supported the unanimous adoption of a UN Security Council resolution to increase aviation security further, including the collection of biometric data from travelers. 45