AST June 2018 Magazine Volume 24 | Page 29

As regulations keep advancing, and Edition make June 2018 moves toward blocking cell phone signals, corrections institutions must keep in mind the possible use of a cell phone as a data storage device as opposed to a data transmission de- In addition to the small prisoners’ phones, vice. cell phones in general continue to be an is- sue in and of themselves. On March 23, 2017, in a 3-0 vote, the mates in very Volume 24 inconspicuous ways: nestled into candy bars or internalized in body cav- ities where few detection technologies can detect them. FCC has provided greater support for According to the National Offender Management jails and prisons to use technology to Service (NOMS), 7,451 mobile phones were con- block cellular signals, thereby making fiscated across UK prisons. it more difficult for inmates to use their That number increased to 9,745 in 2014. cell phones. If you think that number is high, California The order also called for wireless carriers to work alone confiscated nearly 8,000 phones in with corrections facilities more closely to enable 2015. the use of technology based interdiction systems, such as managed access systems (MAS). 3) PHONES AS DATA STORAGE VS. DATA TRANSMISSION With the movements to stop calls, texts, California alone confiscated nearly 8,000 phones in 2015. 27