Association of Cricket Officials Issue 27 | Page 24
Your Letters (continued)
Andrew Beaven, Essex
Thanks for another informative issue of the
magazine – lots to think about!
Re: ECB Recreational Cricket (pages 10 and
11, Issue 26) and Cricket Unleashed
Is it really intended that the Essex clubs
within the M25 (very nearly, although not
quite equivalent to ‘Essex [London
boroughs]’) should be separated from the
Essex County Board for ‘participation’? The
majority of the established clubs will find
this quite a wrench, given that they
currently play in Essex County Leagues
and age-group competitions, and send
players to the Essex representative squads.
I have never seen participation figures, but
removing the Essex London boroughs
(Waltham Forest, Newham, Barking and
Dagenham, Redbridge and Havering) from
the Essex County Board could cut the
population by as much as half.
Answered by Simon Brown, Head of
Regional Operations
The new regional ECB structure has been
created in collaboration with Essex and
attempts to address the specific issues
associated with both rural and urban
cricket. Cricket, and other sports, within
the M25 experience particular pressures
on facilities associated with population
growth and rapid urbanisation. To help
address this we have invested in specific
skills and resources in the London team,
which include those areas of Essex most
affected. In the more rural parts of the
county, the East team is helping to build
on some of the great work already
undertaken to collaborate across the
region and grow the game. I trust this
helps add context to the thinking behind
the structure and specific issues we are
trying to address.
Young Wicketkeepers (page 24, Issue 26)
As a coach (my full-time job), I tell my young keepers that they can take their helmet off only if they are standing six metres
back from the wicket when the ball is delivered... although without any backing in the Laws or ECB guidelines, this seems a
safe (if arbitrary) distance; it takes no account of the risk faced when the keeper moves back up to the stumps to take a
potentially wayward and/or deflected return from the outfield, however. I would probably favour adopting the same
regulations as for batsmen – young keepers to wear helmets at all times.
As stated by Mark Williams on page 24 of Issue 26, umpires should err on the side of caution. The guidance does not
specify any particular distance and some umpires may feel it varies depending on the age of the wicketkeeper and the
speed of the bowling. It is something that umpires should agree with captains/coaches at the meeting prior to the toss.
Incidentally, the guidance was changed in February 2016 to include all ‘practice sessions’. This would include any practice
on the day of the match prior to the toss.
24
email us at [email protected] contact us on 0121 446 2710