ASH Clinical News September 2015 | Page 57

TRAINING and EDUCATION How I Teach “How I Teach” is ASH Clinical News’ forum for sharing best practices in teaching hematology to medical students, residents, and fellows. We invite essays providing insight into teaching and modeling clinical practice (history-taking, the physical exam, informed consent, giving bad news), successful research mentoring, disease-specific tips, or more general advice. Gamini S. Soori, MD, MBA, writes about educating elected officials and hematologists about graduate medical education and the need for advocacy. TEACHING THE ART OF ADVOCACY By Gamini S. Soori, MD, MBA or some time now, the United States health-care system has been undergoing a significant transformation, marked by changes to our delivery and payment systems, accountable care organizations, and the ways we use electronic medical records. The practice of hematology is becoming increasingly regulated, and these regulations are being created by people who are not hematologists. This is why hematologists need to be engaged in health policy issues: No one knows the demands and intricacies of practicing hematology better than hematologists. If we don’t come to the table with input, we will operate under regulations that ignore our needs. Unfortunately, our current graduate medical education (GME) and training programs do not necessarily include education in health policy matters and health systems awareness. Before that becomes a reality in our GME programs, we all must be proactive in ensuring that our needs are met. Headed to the Hill Engagement in health policy among practicing physicians, both in academia and in the private sector, is critical to advancing the day-to-day issues of the practice of hematology, hematology education, hematology research, and its funding. While these issues are important to every hematologist, it is not in our DNA to do this kind of work. In the Council on Graduate Medical