ASH Clinical News February 2016 | Page 42

Literature Scan New and noteworthy research from the medical literature landscape Assessing ADAMTS13 Assays in Thrombotic Microangiopathies Two registry-based studies recently published in the British Journal of Haemotology focused on the role of ADAMTS13 measurements in thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) in confirming a diagnosis of thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and predicting outcomes among TMA patients. TMAs, which are characterized clinically by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and thrombocytopenia, are associated with a variety of conditions or may be seen after exposure to certain medications. Measuring ADAMTS13 levels remains the main method of diagnosing TTP, though the availability of this test is limited and the rarity of TTP makes large registry-based analyses an important tool for studying this disease. Sevda Hassan, from the Department of Nephrology at the Royal London Hospital, and colleagues conducted a retrospective, crosssectional study of suspected TTP cases reported in the United Kingdom (UK) TTP Registry between January 2009 and December 2013. This registry collects all cases of TTP, and data are also gathered via TABLE 1. • Secondary TMA (25.57%) referrals for ADAMTS13 testing in patients with a presumed diagnosis of acute hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS), another TMA. “Despite advances in our understanding of [TMAs], differentiating between them clinically can be challenging, and frequently other more common TMAs need to be excluded,” Dr. Hassan and colleagues wrote. “Lack of rapid diagnostic methods and the need to instigate treatment early has resulted in a reliance on clinical criteria alone, pending a conclusive diagnosis.” With this study, the researchers explored how ADAMTS13 levels may help differentiate these cases, and determined which clinical parameters could be useful in distinguishing among TMAs. Of 810 cases included in the study, 350 were confirmed as TTP (defined as an ADAMTS13 activity <10% and/or the presence of antiADAMTS13 immunoglobulin G antibodies). The remaining 460 nonTTP cases were classified as: • Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli (2.83%) • TMA other (6.74%) • Non-TMA (4.78%) ADAMTS13 levels were significantly lower in patients with TTP (median = 5%; range = 0-11) compared with patients with confirmed diagnoses of aHUS or HUS (median = 66.5%; range = 12-119; p<0.0001; TABLE 1). Patients with TTP also had significantly lower median platelet counts (15 x 109/L vs. 57 x 109/L for aHUS and vs. 35 x 109/L; p<0.0001 for both) and lower median creatinine levels (92 lmol/L vs. 255 lmol/L for aHUS vs. 324 lmol/L for HUS; p<0.0001 for both). However, Dr. Hassan and coauthors noted, “clinical parameters alone were not felt to sufficiently rule out a TTP diagnosis. … Indeed, for approximately a fifth of all TTP cases, using routine laboratory parameters would have failed to identify the correct diagnosis, which could have an impact on therapy.” • No diagnosis (33.91%) • aHUS (27.17%) Laboratory Parameters by Patient Group Median ADAMTS13, percent (range) Median platelet count (range) Median creatinine level, lmol/L (range) TTP aHUS STEC-HUS Secondary TMA 5 (0–11) 66.5 (12–119) 56 (11–8 2) 15 x 109/L (0–96) 57 x 109/L (13–145) 35 x 109/L (14–106) N/A 92 (43–374) 255 (23–941) 324 (117–639) N/A 65 (12–130) STEC-HUS = Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli hemolytic uremic syndrome TPE and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with ADAMTS13 Activity ≤10% Versus >10% TABLE 2. Received TPE Number of TPE treatments Plasma transfused, units Hospital length of stay, days Days to normal platelet count ASH Clinical News ADAMTS13 >10% p Value 65 (95.6) 71 (38.2) <0.0001 11 (5–19) 5 (3–7) <0.0001 125 (46–233) 62 (39–86) <0.0001 9 (7–17) 14 (8–27) <0.002 4 (4–6) 6 (4–9) 0.01 Alive at 90 days 60 (95.2) 96 (57.1) <0.0001 Alive at 360 days 53 (93.0) 76 (47.5) <0.0001 1,384 (513–2,293) 126 (13–1,044) <0.0001 Overall survival, days 40 ADAMTS13 ≤10% A noted limitation of the study was that the UK TTP Registry only provides datasets on TTP cases; the non-TTP cases, therefore, did not have data available on blood counts and final diagnoses. “ADAMTS13 assays are useful to differentiate TTP from other associated TMAs,” the authors concluded. “Prompt identification, treatment, and referral are essential and highlight the importance of using a number of methods, including ADAMTS13 assays, to confirm the diagnosis.” In the second study, Pavan K. Bendapudi, MD, from the Division of Hematology at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and colleagues analyzed data from the Harvard TMA Research Collaborative, a multi-institutional registry, to examine the positive and negative predictive values of ADAMTS13 assay in outcomes in patients with TTP treated with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). “Our data show that patients with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency represent [a] clinically distinct cohort that responds well to TPE,” Dr. Bendapudi and colleagues reported. “In contrast, TMA without severe ADAMTS13 deficiency is associated with increased mortality that may not be influenced by TPE.” The researchers analyzed data from 254 consecutive patients admitted with suspected TTP to three academic medical centers in Boston between January 8, 2004, and August 6, 2013. Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they were admitted with thrombocytopenia and schistocytes indicative of MAHA for whom an ADAMTS13 assay was sent. A total of 186 patients had an ADAMTS13 activity level >10 percent, with a median ADAMTS13 activity level of 56 percent (range = 42-68). Patients with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency were more likely to be younger and female than those with other TMAs, Dr. Bendapudi and colleagues reported. Length of hospitalization periods, time to platelet count recovery, February 2016