ASH Clinical News ACN_5.4_Full Issue_web | Page 37

FEATURE Features Planes, Trains, and VTEs Simple recommendations can help mitigate risk for travel-related blood clots In November 2011, hematologist Suely Rezende, MD, PhD, deplaned from a flight from Lisbon to São Paulo, where she was scheduled to speak at a national hematolo- gy conference. She fainted almost immediately and woke up with a heart rate of about 130 beats per minute. The paramedics at the airport struggled to make a diagnosis, so she assessed her symptoms: “I decided that either I had a heart problem or this was a pulmonary embolism (PE),” she recounted on World Thrombosis Day. 1 Dr. Rezende experienced what many people fear ahead of long flights: a travel-related venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nearly eight years later, she has not suffered any complications from the event, but she started to take extra precautions when planning long-distance travel. “If this were just a regular person, especially not a very demanding person, he or she would probably be sent home and feel bad for a few more days,” she opined. “This would cause terrible complications such as chronic pulmonary hypertension and cardiac failure if [the patient] did not see a medical doctor who could diagnose it.” While stories like Dr. Rezende’s help to raise aware- ness about this potentially fatal complication, the actual absolute risk of a travel-related VTE is quite small – and one that the average traveler does not need to worry about – according to Susan Kahn, MD, MSc, FRCPC, professor of medicine at McGill University and a Canada Research Chair in venous thromboembolism. “Billions of people travel by plane every year, and the vast majority do not get a VTE.” For her part, Dr. Rezende said that she was lucky, considering that she “did everything that we recommend patients don’t do,” she said. 1 “I was very tired in economy class on the plane. I had a boot that came to my knee, and I didn’t move at all. I slept the whole flight, and I was very stuck to the seat.” VTE, including both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PE, occurs in approximately one per 1,000 adults per year in the general population. After prolonged travel – flights of four hours or longer – that risk is estimated to increase by about two- to fourfold, for an absolute risk of an event within four weeks of the flight of about one in 4,600 flights. 2 This risk could increase in people with other predisposing factors for thrombosis (see SIDEBAR , page 36). Still, much more media attention is given to flight- related thrombosis than other risk factors for thrombosis, such as having a cast or undergoing orthopedic surgery. Concerns about travel-related VTE are so prevalent that the American Society of Hematology (ASH) chose to include recommendations for long-distance travelers in its guidelines for VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized and non-hospitalized medical patients, which were released in late 2018. 3 “Millions of people travel every day and travel is a mild risk factor for VTE,” said Mary Cushman, MD, medical director of the Thrombosis and Hemostasis Program at the University of Vermont Medical Center in ASHClinicalNews.org Burlington. Dr. Cushman was chair of the guideline panel that developed the guidelines, on which Dr. Kahn also served as a member. “Our patients are concerned about the risk posed by travel, so recommendations on preven- tion of VTE during travel are necessary.” ASH Clinical News spoke with Dr. Kahn and Dr. Cush- man as members of the guideline-writing panel, as well as other experts in thrombosis, about the misconceptions about travel-related VTE, practical recommendations for patients seeking peace of mind, and the continuing debate about prevention. Cabin Fever Risk factors for travel-related VTE can be broken down into two categories: air cabin risk factors and patient risk factors, according to Casey O’Connell, MD, associate professor in the Jane Anne Nohl Division of Hematology at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California. Many elements inherent to air travel also can promote venous stasis, Dr. O’Connell explained. Flights typically involve sitting in a cramped position where the seat may press against the popliteal vein behind the knee, a common site of clots. Travelers’ ability to move around the cabin might be hampered by flight conditions such as turbulence, their location on the plane, or flight attendants’ use of the aisles. For example, one study of air travel–associated PE found that, although the overall incidence of PE was low, most passengers diagnosed with a severe PE were com- pletely immobile during flight. 4 Dehydration may also play a role in risk for VTE, but evidence is inconsistent. Factors such as low cabin humidity, decreased fluid intake, and the effect of alcohol or coffee consumption during a flight can all contribute to dehydration. 5 Commercial flights also expose passengers to pres- surized cabins and hypobaric hypoxia, a condition that impairs the body’s ability to transfer oxygen from the lungs to the bloodstream. In studies of simulated flights, researchers found mixed effects of hypobaric hypoxia on coagulation activity, but one study examining passengers after a transatlantic flight showed significant reductions in activated partial thromboplastin time and tissue plas- minogen activator, with a rise in plasminogen-activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), suggesting active coagulation and suppressed fibrinolysis. 6 On the whole, though, it is difficult to say conclusively that long-haul air travel puts someone at any increased risk compared with long-distance car travel, according to Mark Crowther, MD, MSc, FRCPC, the Leo Pharma Chair in Thromboembolism Research at McMaster University Medical Centre in Ontario, Canada. “It is not really known that air travel is riskier than car travel; there is a lot of witchcraft to this and only a little bit of science,” Dr. Crowther said. “The data in this area are really poor.” Factors that put patients at an increased VTE risk, irrespective of travel, include age, active cancer diagnosis, pregnancy, oral contraceptive use, recent surgery, obesity, and certain hereditary conditions. 7,8 In its recommendations for travel-associated VTE, the ASH guideline panel considered patients with these fac- tors at greater risk for travel-related VTE, but the panel noted that little evidence exists showing that patients with prior VTE or those with total joint arthroplasty were at any increased risk for travel-related VTE. 3 However, the guideline authors noted that the findings might be biased “if travelers took precautions to reduce their risk of VTE” before flying. Other studies have shown that cancer, plaster casts, hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptives, and pregnancy increased risk for VTE several-fold. Reading Between the Guidelines In ASH’s guidelines, authors issued three recommenda- tions for the prevention of travel-related VTE, all of which were “conditional,” meaning that the right decision will vary for individual patients and that “clinicians must help each patient arrive at a management decision consis- tent with the patient’s values and preferences.” 3 “We suggested all conditional recommendations because the surrounding evidence is quite poor in terms of the amount and the quality of it,” said Dr. Kahn. Con- versely, recommendations are scored as “strong” if the guideline panel authors believe all patients should follow the recommended course of action. For travelers with no additional risk factors for VTE, the authors suggested foregoing the use of graduated compression stockings, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or aspirin for VTE prophylaxis – preventive measures that many providers receive questions about from their patients. “For the average healthy person taking a long-haul flight, we do not recommend anything special beyond the usual commonsense measures, such as getting up and walking around the plane and staying hydrated,” Dr. Kahn said. However, travelers are considered at higher risk for VTE if they have undergone recent surgery, have a his- tory of VTE, are postpartum, have an active malignancy, or have at least one of these factors and are taking hor- mone replacement therapy, have obesity, or are pregnant. For these high-risk travelers, the guidelines suggest use of graduated compression stockings or prophylactic LMWH on flights longer than four hours. Evidence for this recommendation was taken from a 2016 review of the use of compression stockings to prevent DVT in airline passengers. 9 The review in- cluded nine trials, with about half of the 2,637 travelers randomly assigned to wear compression stockings on a ASH Clinical News 35